Slider
Co-existing with wildlife: Prof Gandiwa’s insights on mitigating human-wildlife conflicts in Africa
BY NOKUTHABA DLAMINI
VicFallsLive Managing Editor, Nokuthaba Dlamini sat down with Professor Patience Gandiwa to discuss the issue of human-wildlife conflicts as she assumes her new role as Chairperson of the African Group of Negotiators on Wildlife.
As Africa’s human population continues to increase in areas where people are already co-existing with wildlife, so does the frequency of human-wildlife conflicts due to the inevitable spatial overlaps that happen. This complex issue affects not only conservation efforts but also the livelihoods of local communities. Sometimes a landscape of fear is created affecting the social life for both humans and wildlife.
Professor Gandiwa shed light on the challenges and potential solutions to this pressing problem.
Gandiwa emphasized the need for objectivity and inclusivity in addressing human-wildlife conflicts. At Africa level, context is very important as the situation is not homogenous across the continent. “I look at these issues objectively, without taking a solely Zimbabwean perspective. I need to understand the context of my colleagues in other sub-regions in Africa, to appreciate the situation in their countries, the threats they face, and options at their disposal to address the challenges. By doing so, we can determine what’s best for Africa (as a whole) without running the risk of being too prescriptive. I remember talking to a friend from Gabon Dr Lea-Larisa Moukagni (Gabon National Parks Agency) who shared many increasing human-elephant conflict challenges her country is facing with increasing elephant population as well as increasing human population. Zimbabwe is facing similar challenges and there are opportunities to learn from each other
Matetsi woman attacked by a crocodile
We sometimes make difficult decisions at global level to accommodate African countries unique situations, such as listing species in different appendices. That alone also comes with itsown challenges.
She highlighted the complexity of human-wildlife conflicts, citing the growing population of both humans and wildlife. “Africa’s population is growing, and in some parts of Africa, we have seen significant increase in wildlife populations. Coupled with that, we have also seen an increasing trajectory in livestock populations in the same landscapes dominated by wildlife, but the land areas of these places or countries have not necessarily been expanding. Therefore this is really one of the serious challenges of our time, where the whole–of–society and whole-of-government approach must be demonstrated. It’s not just a nice thing to adopt or a nice approach, but it’s actually a necessity.”
Gandiwa stressed the importance of investing in technological applications to better understand wildlife movement patterns and spatial overlaps. “We need to invest in technology, for example, that brings in tech companies and technopreneurial innovators to say, ‘How can we take advantage of biotelemetry and invest in satellite collars so that we understand and do more research to understand the movement patterns and map the conflict hotspots, targeting those species that are actually coming into conflict?’ How can we innovate, for example, to explore sustainable financing that support implementation of livelihood diversification strategies and alternatives in the face of climate change?”
Lion beheaded by poachers
She also emphasized the need for innovative approaches to addressing human-wildlife conflict. “If the wildlife constituency was not necessarily engaging with agriculture and water, this is the time to talk to each other and say, ‘Hey, out of the 370 people that have lost their lives in Zimbabwe due to human wildlife conflicts since 2019 and the 453 seriously injured, 939 cattle, 166 donkeys and 203 goats lost to carnivores, maybe the majority of victims that died have been attacked by crocodiles. Why are people losing their lives at these life-giving rivers? Yes, they are monsters – monster crocs in these rivers. There are hippos too and hippos are dangerous animals too. Hippos and crocs are dangerous fauna listed under the Parks and Wildlife Act, despite their Appendix II listing under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES). How can we bring water to the people then if people are dying or being maimed trying to fetch water from the rivers? What can we do to prevent livestock loses each time they are taken to the river for water? Perhaps drilling boreholes, again, being mindful of safe-yield principles and safeguards on managing the risk of aquifer depletion. There are other novel means of mitigating human wildlife conflicts which have been tested successfully in various parts of Africa, from participatory landuse planning to use of bees as recognition of traditional ecological knowledge. Now, these are the kinds of discussionswe need.
Africa still requires more investment in sustainable and long-term measures. Mitigation of human-wildlife conflicts is usuallymuch less costly and much more effective and sustainable if we invest more in mitigation initiatives such as conservation agriculture, awareness raising, avoiding a the problem is better than trying to address it when it has already happened for example when someone who has lost their limb or worse still, dies.” There is no compensation scheme that can ever replace someone’s life, we can only talk of some relief.
Gandiwa highlighted the importance of empowering local communities and involving them in decision-making processes. “We really need to explore other non-conventional approaches of providing livelihoods such as innovation hubs in the wildlife-rich areas, promotion of the Arts and Crafts industry, support for sustainable tourism and green energy investments.”
Instead of someone going to the river to catch that fish only. How can we innovate in the space of cage-culture and aquaculture? Zimbabwe has over 10,000 dams outside the protected area network, for example, where viable projects in fish farming or even crocodile farming can be explored and unlock new opportunities for jobs, economic emancipation, and also mitigating human-wildlife conflicts.”
The issue of human-wildlife conflicts is further complicated by the need for international cooperation and fair-trade practices. Gandiwa noted that the decline in international donor assistance has led countries like Zimbabwe to seek alternative solutions. “This is why, when there is a decline in international donor assistance, countries in facing budget shortfalls on conservation financing might say, ‘Okay, if there is no aid, what about legal trade opportunities in line with Africa’s wildlife economy growth aspirations?’ African countries can unlock the value of what they have already, sustainably sweating their own natural capital assets through clean and secure legal markets, perhaps the funding gap can be bridged?“ Financial resource constrains often limit what African countries can do for themselves without holding a begging bowl.
Rescued snared elephant in Victoria Falls
Gandiwa also emphasized the need for local communities to have a voice in decision-making processes that affect them. “It’s actually quite a highly emotive issue, and it’s such a sensitive and multi-dimensional issue related to human-wildlife conflictswhen we mirror it in international discourse on trade and CITES-listed species. There’s been quite a pushback in terms of the participation of local communities in the decision-making and advisory framework of the governing bodies and processes, which has also been viewed as not so nice or not so progressive.”
As the Chairperson of the African Group of Negotiators on Wildlife, Gandiwa is committed to work closely with all African countries in finding sustainable solutions to human-wildlife conflicts, particularly conflicts involving endangered species listed under CITES as well as migratory species listed under the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Fauna
BY NOKUTHABA DLAMINI
In the small town of Bela-Bela, a quietly flourishing business is unfolding — one that turns wildlife into livelihood, education, and economic opportunity. On a humid afternoon, we walked into the operations of Estelle Nel Taxidermy (and its parent networks), where rows of beautiful animal mounts — from antelope horns to zebra skins, skulls to full-body trophies — line the walls.
But beyond the busts and custom mounts lies a deeper purpose: this is not simply a display of hunting trophies. It is a system of sustainable use — where animals that die naturally or are hunted legally are completely utilised: meat, skin, horns, bones — nothing goes to waste, and everything acquires value.
As we discovered from our conversations, this network extends beyond taxidermy. Adjacent to the showrooms are processing facilities, butcheries, and game-meat wholesalers — all integral to transforming South Africa’s wild fauna into a formal, regulated, and sustainable economy.
“This is home” — an artisan’s vocation
I sat down with Melanie Viljoen, who serves as Export Secretary at Estelle Nel Taxidermy. Her voice was calm, resolute.
“For me, it’s like this is home and it’s something that I love to do. I love art. I studied art at school. I can’t think of anything else I’d rather do.”
She told us she’s been with the business for thirteen to fourteen years. Over that time she’s mastered a unique craft. “I’ve found my niche,” she said, “and I’m not going anywhere.”
Melanie explained how the business flows: outfitters bring in international clients to hunt on private farms, then process the animals: trophy mounts for some, meat for others. Locals also bring animals — sometimes for trophies, sometimes just for meat. There is even “school-mount” work: smaller species, sometimes a mother and its young, carefully preserved — not just for hunters, but for children to touch and learn about wildlife up close.
“We mount animals that have died naturally or were hunted… we use everything, from the meat to the skins and curls. It’s a sustainable way of doing business, and everything has a monetary value.”
This, she says, is both business and passion — blending artistry, conservation, and commerce.
From workshops to global markets — taxidermy meets commerce
According to membership details o South African Taxidermy & Tannery Association, Estelle Nel Taxidermy offers a wide range of services: from mounting mammals, birds, reptiles; tanning skins and capes; cleaning, mounting and articulating skulls, bones, horns, tusks; to producing novelty leather items, polished horn décor, engraved bones, hoof lamps — even gunbags and furniture. They offer full export packing and crating services, and help clients ship internationally.
What this means is that skins, hides and trophies — once the culmination of a hunt — become far more than personal souvenirs. They become export commodities, contributing to livelihoods of artisans, packers, shippers, and everyone in between.
Yet, as Pieter Swart President of South African Taxidermy & Tannery Association (SATTA)/chairman of SUCO-SA) told us, that path to global markets is not without obstacles.
“Certain airlines allow the shipping of these trophies. I think it’s about four airlines that you can ship them overseas, but the rest refuse to take their hunting trophies to destinations. As well as the sea shipments — there’s only one ship going to America every three months. The rest of the shipping lines refuse to take hunting trophies.”
He lamented the difficulty in logistics. And yet, he sees themselves as part of a broader — and misunderstood — effort. “This anti-animal works movement created the idea that hunting is killing the animals and destroying them to extinction — but that is actually quite the opposite,” he said. “More and more, the guys are farming the animals; that is creating a better future for the animals.”
In other words: regulated, sustainable use — of every part of the animal — can coexist with conservation, economic empowerment, and community upliftment.
Next door to the taxidermy showroom, we toured a modest but hygienic meat-processing Camo Meat facility, run by people like Ina Hechter. They explained that their business started small — in 2012 as a private processing butcher for animals from farms. Around 2017 they expanded into wholesale for local markets. Export remains limited, but local demand is growing.
Their meats include species typical of the South African game-meat industry: kudu, impala, springbok, wildebeest, zebra and others. What began as a niche — somewhat stigmatised — trade is slowly gaining acceptance. Some supermarkets and lodges are carrying game meat; more restaurants are offering “veld flavour.”
Ina told me that in times of drought — when traditional livestock farming may suffer — game-meat businesses often see increased activity. Farms with overstocked wildlife or animals unable to survive drought may harvest and sell meat, skins and other resources. In this way, what might have been a loss can become income, conservation, and food security.
“Our parks are so small that they can’t sustain all the animals that are there,” Ina said. “Especially in drought years … when it’s not raining a lot you will see they die and then they sell the animals.”M
She sees game meat not only as a business, but as part of a broader sustainable economy — offering healthy, lean protein to consumers, easing pressure on overburdened habitats, and circulating value in rural and peri-urban communities.
More than meat and trophies — a conservation-economy model
What struck me during the tour was how holistic the operation is. It isn’t just about hunters bringing back trophies. It’s about using every bit of what exists: meat, skins, hides, horns, bones — even skulls, and decorative by-products. From full-body mounts to polished horn décor, from retail game-meat packages to furniture made from hoofs: this is a full-value chain.
Companies like Estelle Nel Taxidermy are members of formal trade associations and provide professional services — tanning, mounting, packing, export documentation — and in doing so, they help formalize trade in wildlife products.
Meanwhile, the game meat industry — though historically informal — is slowly growing more regulated. According to a recent national biodiversity-economy strategy, game-meat production supports economic growth, food security, and employment. The most commonly produced and consumed species: impala, kudu, wildebeest, springbok.
In other words: when properly managed, this sector has the potential to transform perceptions of wildlife — from being simply “wild animals” to resources that can feed, employ and uplift entire communities.
Challenges — logistics, stigma, regulation
But it’s not all smooth. As Pieter Swart highlighted, export logistics remain a bottleneck: only a few airlines transport trophies; shipping lines are often reluctant; sea freight to markets like the United States may come only every few months. This makes it harder for the industry to scale globally.
Domestically, the market for game meat and wildlife products still battles cultural and regulatory stigma. Many people still frown at game meat; supermarkets and restaurants are only slowly integrating it.
Regulation is another issue: for the industry to be sustainable, wildlife needs to be farmed or managed responsibly, harvesting must follow quotas, and processing must meet health and safety standards. When abattoirs, tanneries, and exporting agents comply with regulation, this gives the industry legitimacy — but it also requires oversight, capacity, and buy-in from all stakeholders.
Our visit painted a picture of a wildlife economy that’s evolving: where skilled artisans turn skins, horns, skulls into enduring art; where processors supply game meat to homes, restaurants and hotels; where farms, outfitters, taxidermists, meat processors, exporters, and even children (learning from mounted displays) all form part of an ecosystem.
It’s a world that challenges simplistic ideas of wildlife as either “pristine wilderness” or “endangered species.” Instead, it shows how — if managed with respect, regulation, and purpose — natural resources can sustain livelihoods, build economies, and forge a bridge between conservation and commerce.
For many of those involved — from Melanie Viljoen to Ina Hechter and Pieter Swart — it’s not just business. It’s home. It’s art. It’s the future.
-
Slider3 years agoInnscor launches brewery to produce Nyathi beer
-
National4 years agoIn perched rural Matabeleland North, renewable energy is vital
-
Tourism and Environment4 years agoStrive Masiyiwa’s daughter opens luxury Victoria Falls lodge
-
Opinion4 years agoA street art mural in Zimbabwe exposes a divided society
-
Special reports4 years agoTinashe Mugabe’s DNA show’s popularity soars, causes discomfort for some
-
National4 years agoVictoria Falls’ pilot dies in helicopter crash
-
National3 years agoCommission of inquiry findings fail to be tabled as Victoria Falls councillors fight
-
National3 years agoHwange coal miner fires workers over salary dispute