Connect with us

Slider

Co-existing with wildlife: Prof Gandiwa’s insights on mitigating human-wildlife conflicts in Africa

Published

on

BY NOKUTHABA DLAMINI 

VicFallsLive Managing Editor, Nokuthaba Dlamini sat down with Professor Patience Gandiwa to discuss the issue of human-wildlife conflicts as she assumes her new role as Chairperson of the African Group of Negotiators on Wildlife.

Advertisement

As Africa’s human population continues to increase in areas where people are already co-existing with wildlife, so does the frequency of human-wildlife conflicts due to the inevitable spatial overlaps that happen. This complex issue affects not only conservation efforts but also the livelihoods of local communities. Sometimes a landscape of fear is created affecting the social life for both humans and wildlife.

Professor Gandiwa shed light on the challenges and potential solutions to this pressing problem.

Gandiwa emphasized the need for objectivity and inclusivity in addressing human-wildlife conflicts. At Africa level, context is very important as the situation is not homogenous across the continent. “I look at these issues objectively, without taking a solely Zimbabwean perspective. I need to understand the context of my colleagues in other sub-regions in Africa, to appreciate the situation in their countries, the threats they face, and options at their disposal to address the challenges. By doing so, we can determine what’s best for Africa (as a whole) without running the risk of being too prescriptive. I remember talking to a friend from Gabon Dr Lea-Larisa Moukagni (Gabon National Parks Agency) who shared many increasing human-elephant conflict challenges her country is facing with increasing elephant population as well as increasing human population. Zimbabwe is facing similar challenges and there are opportunities to learn from each other

Advertisement

Matetsi woman attacked by a crocodile

We sometimes make difficult decisions at global level to accommodate African countries unique situations, such as listing species in different appendices. That alone also comes with itsown challenges.

She highlighted the complexity of human-wildlife conflicts, citing the growing population of both humans and wildlife. “Africa’s population is growing, and in some parts of Africa, we have seen significant increase in wildlife populations. Coupled with that, we have also seen an increasing trajectory in livestock populations in the same landscapes dominated by wildlife, but the land areas of these places or countries have not necessarily been expanding. Therefore this is really one of the serious challenges of our time, where the wholeofsociety and whole-of-government approach must be demonstrated. It’s not just a nice thing to adopt or a nice approach, but it’s actually a necessity.”

 

Gandiwa stressed the importance of investing in technological applications to better understand wildlife movement patterns and spatial overlaps. “We need to invest in technology, for example, that brings in tech companies and technopreneurial innovators to say, ‘How can we take advantage of biotelemetry and invest in satellite collars so that we understand and do more research to understand the movement patterns and map the conflict hotspots, targeting those species that are actually coming into conflict?’ How can we innovate, for example, to explore sustainable financing that support implementation of livelihood diversification strategies and alternatives in the face of climate change?”

Advertisement

Lion beheaded by poachers

She also emphasized the need for innovative approaches to addressing human-wildlife conflict. “If the wildlife constituency was not necessarily engaging with agriculture and water, this is the time to talk to each other and say, ‘Hey, out of the 370 people that have lost their lives in Zimbabwe due to human wildlife conflicts since 2019 and the 453 seriously injured, 939 cattle, 166 donkeys and 203 goats lost to carnivores, maybe the majority of victims that died have been attacked by crocodiles. Why are people losing their lives at these life-giving rivers? Yes, they are monsters – monster crocs in these rivers. There are hippos too and hippos are dangerous animals too. Hippos and crocs are dangerous fauna listed under the Parks and Wildlife Act, despite their Appendix II listing under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES). How can we bring water to the people then if people are dying or being maimed trying to fetch water from the rivers? What can we do to prevent livestock loses each time they are taken to the river for water? Perhaps drilling boreholes, again, being mindful of safe-yield principles and safeguards on managing the risk of aquifer depletion. There are other novel means of mitigating human wildlife conflicts which have been tested successfully in various parts of Africa, from participatory landuse planning to use of bees as recognition of traditional ecological knowledge. Now, these are the kinds of discussionswe need.

Africa still requires more investment in sustainable and long-term measures. Mitigation of human-wildlife conflicts is usuallymuch less costly and much more effective and sustainable if we invest more in mitigation initiatives such as conservation agriculture, awareness raising, avoiding a the problem is better than trying to address it when it has already happened for example when someone who has lost their limb or worse still, dies.” There is no compensation scheme that can ever replace someone’s life, we can only talk of some relief.

Gandiwa highlighted the importance of empowering local communities and involving them in decision-making processes. “We really need to explore other non-conventional approaches of providing livelihoods such as innovation hubs in the wildlife-rich areas, promotion of the Arts and Crafts industry, support for sustainable tourism and green energy investments.

Instead of someone going to the river to catch that fish only. How can we innovate in the space of cage-culture and aquaculture? Zimbabwe has over 10,000 dams outside the protected area network, for example, where viable projects in fish farming or even crocodile farming can be explored and unlock new opportunities for jobs, economic emancipation, and also mitigating human-wildlife conflicts.”

Advertisement

The issue of human-wildlife conflicts is further complicated by the need for international cooperation and fair-trade practices. Gandiwa noted that the decline in international donor assistance has led countries like Zimbabwe to seek alternative solutions. “This is why, when there is a decline in international donor assistance, countries in facing budget shortfalls on conservation financing might say, ‘Okay, if there is no aid, what about legal trade opportunities in line with Africa’s wildlife economy growth aspirations?’ African countries can unlock the value of what they have already, sustainably sweating their own natural capital assets through clean and secure legal markets, perhaps the funding gap can be bridged? Financial resource constrains often limit what African countries can do for themselves without holding a begging bowl.

Rescued snared elephant in Victoria Falls

Gandiwa also emphasized the need for local communities to have a voice in decision-making processes that affect them. “It’s actually quite a highly emotive issue, and it’s such a sensitive and multi-dimensional issue related to human-wildlife conflictswhen we mirror it in international discourse on trade and CITES-listed species. There’s been quite a pushback in terms of the participation of local communities in the decision-making and advisory framework of the governing bodies and processes, which has also been viewed as not so nice or not so progressive.”

As the Chairperson of the African Group of Negotiators on Wildlife, Gandiwa is committed to work closely with all African countries in finding sustainable solutions to human-wildlife conflicts, particularly conflicts involving endangered species listed under CITES as well as migratory species listed under the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Fauna 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

In the community

Hwange West MP demands urgent action after two killed by elephants in Victoria Falls

Published

on

BY NOKUTHABA DLAMINI 

VICTORIA FALLS – Hwange West legislator Vusumuzi Moyo has called for urgent and decisive intervention to address escalating human-elephant conflict after two people were killed by elephants in Victoria Falls within the space of a week.

Advertisement

Rising on a point of national interest in the National Assembly, Moyo said the recent deaths had left families in mourning and exposed the growing danger faced by communities living near wildlife corridors.

“In closing, Mr Speaker Sir, I want to convey my message to two families within Victoria Falls. This happened within a week. They lost their lives because of this conflict,” Moyo said. “In a space of a week, two families are mourning the loss of their loved ones.”

Victoria Falls and surrounding communities, which border wildlife areas, have in recent years experienced increased incidents of elephants straying into residential areas, destroying crops and infrastructure, and in some cases fatally attacking residents.

Advertisement

Moyo told Parliament that the crisis must no longer be viewed solely as a conservation issue but as a matter of human dignity and national development.

“My issue is not merely about wildlife management. It is about national development, constitutional responsibility and ultimately, protecting human dignity,” he said.

He warned that communities from Kariba to Binga, and in tourism corridors around Victoria Falls, are “under siege” from escalating human-elephant conflict.

Advertisement

“Families are losing crops, infrastructure is being destroyed and tragically, lives continue to be lost. This House cannot ignore the cries of rural citizens who coexist with wildlife every day,” Moyo said.

The Hwange West MP defended previous government decisions to cull elephants in high-conflict zones, arguing that such measures were sometimes necessary to restore ecological balance and protect human life.

“These are not acts of recklessness but acts of necessity because conservation must never come at the expense of human survival,” he said.

Advertisement

While acknowledging the importance of non-lethal measures such as fencing and translocation, Moyo said in some areas those interventions were no longer sufficient on their own.

He urged authorities to urgently implement provisions of the Parks and Wildlife Act, promulgated on 28 November 2025, particularly in communities bordering national parks.

“It is my sincere hope that the implementation of the Parks and Wildlife Act… will be taken to the areas that border within national parks so that people appreciate and that the regulations can be done as fast as possible,” he said.

Advertisement

Moyo stressed that Parliament must strike a balance between conservation and protecting human life.

“The people are not asking Parliament to choose between elephants and human beings. They are asking us to restore the balance,” he said.

The latest fatalities have renewed debate in Victoria Falls over how authorities can better safeguard residents while maintaining Zimbabwe’s strong conservation reputation.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

In the community

Grace-and-Favour: Binga RDC builds $200k lakeside mansion for CEO despite government ban

Published

on

BY TANAKA MREWA

In a district where hunger drives thousands of children out of school and most households lack basic sanitation, a luxury four-bedroom house with a jacuzzi is nearing completion on the shores of Lake Kariba, built at public expense for the long-serving chief executive of one of Zimbabwe’s poorest local authorities.

Advertisement

An investigation by CITE reveals that Binga Rural District Council (RDC) has spent close to US$200 000 constructing a “grace-and-favour” home for its chief executive officer, Joshua Muzamba, despite a standing government directive prohibiting local authorities from building personal residences for senior officials.

The development has ignited questions about governance, accountability and political protection in a district consistently ranked among Zimbabwe’s poorest, and where residents say public resources are routinely diverted from desperately needed services.

The house sits on a two-acre stand overlooking Lake Kariba, in an exclusive peninsula neighbourhood about six kilometres from Binga town, surrounded by water on two sides.

Advertisement

Council records and sources familiar with the project say the stand, valued at over US$40 000, was allocated to Muzamba free of charge. The property includes four bedrooms – three of them ensuite – a jacuzzi and two garages.

The project’s cost and scale contrast sharply with living conditions in the district.

Official statistics paint a grim picture: ZimStat data shows that 73 percent of households in Binga lack toilets, while many communities travel long distances for schools and healthcare facilities amid largely impassable roads.

Advertisement

Education ministry figures indicate that in 2022 alone, 6 671 pupils dropped out of school, while more than 13 000 children were irregular attendees due to hunger.

Yet despite chronic underdevelopment, council funds have been channelled into the high-end residence.

Muzamba and the council did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Advertisement

A ministry of local government circular issued on October 6, 2014 (Circular CX154) explicitly forbids local authorities from allocating institutional properties to employees, mayors or council chairpersons.

The ministry’s spokesperson Gabriel Masvora confirmed the directive remains in force.

“The government’s wish is to see improved service delivery prioritised in local authorities for the benefit of the people,” Masvora said. “Local authorities are a third tier of government which have systems and controls in place to ensure resources are used effectively.”

Advertisement

He added that councillors should scrutinise expenditures to ensure compliance with government policy and residents’ priorities.

The Association of Rural District Councils of Zimbabwe (ARDCZ), with Muzamba as chair, passed a resolution allowing construction of houses for senior officials after 10 years of service, effectively sidestepping central government policy.

Muzamba has led Binga RDC for 14 years, a tenure marked by recurring controversies.

Advertisement

Fanuel Cumanzala, the MP for Binga South (CCC) describes the CEO as a dominant figure operating with little internal resistance.

“He has become a liability to Binga,” Cumanzala said. “Whatever he does is for personal gain, not for the wellbeing of the people. Councillors are afraid to go against him.”

Cumanzala alleges the CEO survives political pressure because of backing from influential figures with economic interests in the district.

Advertisement

Muzamba lost his position in Zanu PF’s central committee in 2018 after the Supreme Court ruled public officials could not hold multiple posts simultaneously.

Concerns over governance at Binga RDC stretch back years.

In 2018, police requested a full audit of the council after investigations into suspected theft of trust property revealed potential financial irregularities.

Advertisement

The then senior assistant commissioner Stephen Mutamba, now police commissioner general, wrote to the local government ministry recommending a comprehensive audit after police uncovered evidence that council employees were allegedly under-receipting cash.

The subsequent ministry audit found serious weaknesses, including: bank transfers not being recorded in cash books; rampant under-receipting; an absence of an authenticated employment policy, exposing the council to nepotism and unethical hiring practices; and unsigned council minutes, raising doubts about the authenticity of the records.

Despite these findings, residents say meaningful corrective action never followed.

Advertisement

Muzamba is accused of protecting one employee, Lovemore Siamuyi, who was implicated in earlier investigations and remains employed.

Current and former council insiders allege the CEO has filled the local authority with relatives, claims he has not publicly addressed.

A council official, speaking anonymously for fear of reprisals, said a previous resolution capped staff numbers at 50 due to financial constraints, leading to retrenchments.

Advertisement

“But soon after that, more people started being employed,” the source said. “Now the place is flooded with his kinsmen.”

Employees describe a workplace climate of fear and factionalism.

Residents also question a council resolution allowing senior officials to purchase service vehicles at book value after five years, a policy they say disproportionately benefits senior executives and their associates.

Advertisement

“This means residents effectively buy new vehicles every five years,” said one ratepayer.

The council is reportedly struggling with cash flow, at times paying salaries through allocations of housing stands instead of wages.

Muzamba’s critics argue that such challenges make spending on his luxury house especially difficult to justify.

Advertisement

The Auditor-General has previously warned that similar practices elsewhere risk undermining service delivery. In 2022, Marondera RDC was flagged after building a CEO residence using capital development funds. The Auditor-General cautioned that “service delivery may be compromised as council funds are used for unintended purposes.”

Matabeleland North Minister Richard Moyo said his office had received no formal complaints about corruption at Binga RDC.

“We haven’t received any official reports pertaining to this matter,” he said, suggesting some allegations could be politically motivated disputes between councillors from different parties.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the government says a Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission (ZACC) taskforce is examining corruption allegations across local authorities.

“If there are any reports made, the committee will swiftly look into the issues,” Masvora said.

The MP Cumanzala said it was particularly disheartening that communities in Binga remain trapped in poverty despite vast natural resources including Lake Kariba fisheries, forests teeming with wildlife and mineral wealth.

Advertisement

“Binga RDC is one of the worst run in the country in the sense that we have so much resources and a lot of potential and we receive a lot of attention from non-governmental organisations and the government itself, but those resources are being pocketed by certain people,” he said.

SOURCE: CITE

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Slider

Hwange lion DNA helps convict poachers for first time

Published

on

BY BBC

Lion DNA has been used to successfully prosecute poachers for the first time in the world, it has emerged.

Advertisement

Wildlife crime experts have only just revealed how they were able to identify the individual animal from body parts found in a suspect’s village, as they matched a profile on Zimbabwe’s lion database.

A blood sample had previously been taken from the male lion, which was being tracked by authorities in Hwange National Park – using a radio collar.

Two poachers were convicted for the 2024 incident and sent to prison in what is thought to be the first prosecution of its kind.

Advertisement

 

The details of the convictions and the role the DNA database played have been previously unknown.

Non-governmental organisation (NGO) Traffic, which works to combat the illegal trade in wildlife, has shared the detail with us.

Advertisement

In May 2024, authorities in Hwange National Park became suspicious after a radio collar worn by a male lion stopped working.

Investigators and police traced its last known position and found a snare with lion fur attached to it.

After collecting forensic evidence they questioned two men in a nearby village and discovered three sacks of meat, 16 lion claws and four teeth. These body parts would later be tested against the database, with the DNA from all matching the profile of that missing lion.

Advertisement

But possessing lion parts is not necessarily a crime in Zimbabwe.

Having them can be explained away as old, traditional ornaments or as coming from an animal that died of natural causes.

This has been an obstacle to prosecutions in the past.

Advertisement

But thanks to a breakthrough in DNA profiling, that’s now changed.

The lab generated a DNA profile from the recovered body parts and compared this to the profile previously generated from a blood sample of the lion with the radio collar.

The two profiles matched and scientists were able to identify the specific missing animal.

Advertisement

Over the last eight years the Victoria Falls Wildlife Trust (VFWT) has received about £250,000 from the People’s Postcode Lottery in the UK to build up the DNA database of lions in Zimbabwe.

The scientist at the trust, who made the discovery, asked to remain anonymous for his own safety, but said:

“Before we had access to this technology, we were only able to do species identification, but sometimes that’s not enough.

Advertisement

“We can essentially match those claws or those products to the lion of interest that we are looking for.”

Within 10 days of the killing, the DNA evidence was presented in court.

Two men pleaded guilty and were given 24 month prison sentences.

Advertisement

The hearing was told the value of the lion was about $20,000.

Richard Scobey, Traffic’s executive director, said “countries now have the forensic capability to bring, solid science-based evidence to court” and that it will have global impact.

This is understood to be the first time that DNA from an individual lion has been identified and used to prosecute poachers.

Advertisement

Professor Rob Ogden has been closely involved in setting up the project and is co- founder of the organisation Trace, which promotes the use of forensic science in wildlife law enforcement.

He says the prosecution gives “a message of hope” and shows what can be done using a combination of training, research and development and forensic casework.

Recent figures suggest an increase in the number of lions being killed for their body parts which are then sold both as cultural objects in Africa and for traditional Chinese medicine.

Advertisement

It is thought the rise may be down to organised crime gangs also involved in the illegal trade in Rhino horn and ivory trafficking.

In Mozambique between 2010 and 2023, 426 lions were killed as a result of contact with humans with a quarter linked to deliberate poaching.

A measure of the scale of the trade is also the number of seizures by the authorities in recent years.

Advertisement

That includes 17 lion skulls found in Lusaka in 2021, reportedly en-route from South Africa, and a 2023 seizure in Maputo of more than 300kg of lion body parts.

Which is why this breakthrough on DNA identification is seen as sending an important message to would-be poachers.

 

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 VicFallsLive. All rights reserved, powered by Advantage