Connect with us

Slider

Wildlife AGN chairperson reflects on the ivory trade ban and the need for fresh perspectives

Published

on


BY NOKUTHABA DLAMINI

Professor Patience Gandiwa, the newly appointed chairperson of the African Group of Negotiators (AGN) on Wildlife, has emphasized the urgent need for African countries to rethink their ideas and potential solutions around the contentious ivory trade ban.

Advertisement

“Africa needs to reflect deeply on the implications of this ban and work collaboratively to find acceptable (and sustainable) solutions that take into account the diverse perspectives within our African communities,” she asserted.

In a compelling dialogue with VicFallsLive, Gandiwa addressed the pressing issues posed by the ivory trade ban, which has, for a long time now, become a significant point of contention in African nations.

To give a brief background on the subject matter.

Advertisement

Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) banned the international commercial ivory trade in 1989. In 1997, at the 10th Conference of Parties (COP) hosted by Zimbabwe in Harare, a decision was adopted to allow for once-off trade in ivory, recognizing that Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe had healthy populations of elephants, and gave permission for a once-offsale of ivory to Japan in 1999 and financial resources for elephant conservation were raised from legal sales of ivory derived from existing stocks gathered from elephants that died as a result of natural causes or from problem-animal control.

The elephant populations of Botswana, South Africa, Namibia and Zimbabwe are listed in Appendix II of the Convention (which allows for regulated commercial trade), while all other African elephant populations are listed in Appendix I (which prohibits all commercial trade).

Following the once-off sale, a ban of ivory trade was put under CITES in 2008, for 9 consecutive years/3 CoPs (as per annotation) technically lapsed, but still in force as there is no mechanism for such trade under CITES.

Advertisement

This has, over the years, sparked ongoing devisive debates amongst African nations, as they grapple with the implications on ‘both-side-of the-coin’.

Whilst CITES CoP10 (Resolution.10.10) marked a significant step in addressing the complexities of the ivory trade, particularly in the context of the historic establishment of Elephant Trade Information System (ETIS) to monitor and analyze illegal ivory trade trends and the emphasis on better stock management and international cooperation, crucial in the ongoing efforts to combat illegal ivory trade and protect elephant populations, some challenges have persisted.

“The issue of ivory trade has long been a contentious topic,” Gandiwa remarked.

Advertisement

“Currently, there seems to be no one-size-fits-all solution on how we can approach this matter and I believe, through constructive dialogue, we should find practical and sustainable options to explore

“The bottom-line though, we all know that unregulated international trade can push threatened and endangered species to extinction, especially when combined with factors such as habitat loss, human-wildlife conflicts and climate change. We also know that banning trade is also not a panacea as such bans have been enforced for several species and did not necessarily yield desired outcomes.

At the same time there are case studies demonstrating that putting economic value on species can cancreate significant incentives for its conservation and recovery (the Zimbabwean nile crocodile is a good example), and yet still that approach may not work for other species. Therefore, what can we do about the current ivory dilemma under CITES?”

Advertisement

Zimbabwe for example, with its second-largest population of elephants globally, has felt the economic and ecological weight of this restriction acutely.

“As elephants die naturally or are culled due to human-animal conflict, the ivory collected is stored securely,” she explains, emphasizing the implications of the accumulated stockpile.

The country is sitting on over 130 tones of ivory, a figure that has grown since the last sale in 2008. This situation raises urgent questions about how we can address the stockpiling and the challenges that arise from it.”

Advertisement

Advert

Botswana, Namibia and South Africa are facing similar challenges. On the other hand, the status of several African elephant populations remains endangered and critically endangered (as per classification of IUCN for both species of Loxodonta) and still in dire need of concerted efforts and measures to improve the situation. There are seemingly no obvious solutions, and we need to wear our ‘thinking caps’ and confront this matter starting with dialogue.

Gandiwa’s perspective highlighted the necessity for African nations to engage in constructive and collaborative dialogue.

“If Africa agrees to disagree on this contentious issue of ivory stockpiles, we must ask: What alternatives can we explore to create a win-win situation?” she proposes, advocating for a united approach to address conservation challenges while acknowledging the realities of countries across the heterogenous landscape of Africa.

Furthermore, Gandiwa highlighted the recent global shifts in international development assistance, urging African nations to innovate and identify new financing mechanisms beyond trade.

Advertisement

“We can no longer depend solely on traditional funding sources,”.

“We need to explore proposals such as biodiversity credits, recognition of the role of wildlife in climate action and provide the necessary funding to protect Africa’s charismatic wildlife without relying on the traditional sources of financing conservation in light of growing shifts of priorities in the global finance landscapes. Some donor countries are becoming more inward-looking prioritising addressing conflicts and strenghtening securing over environment or wildlife matters.If we can draw inspiration from how carbon credit market and even financial engineering innovations developed over the years, Africa has the capacity to generate the much-needed revenue to finance species conservation. Most of the options however, still rely on functional multilaralism.

Exploring Viable Alternatives

Advertisement

As the discussions deepened, Gandiwa emphasized that multiple alternatives are available even if trade does not emerge as a viable option (at this stage) for all countries ND stakeholdersconcerned. “We have seen a range of proposed solutions in previous negotiations, such as Mobilizing Sustainable Finance For African Elephant Conservation and other endangered species,” she recalls. “Now it is time to take those proposals further— to operationalize them, secure initial capital, and implement innovative strategies that align with our unique challenges.”

She further elaborated on the need for understanding and cooperation within the African Group of Negotiators on Wildlife.

“A debate over whether to allow the ivory trade shouldn’t lead to fragmentation among us. If one party opposes the trade for their own reasons while another seeks to justify it, it doesn’t mean either is wrong. Both perspectives are valid,” she suggested. “What we need to do is recognize these differing views and find workable for solutions that bridge our differences rather than push us further apart.”

Advertisement

Navigating the Path Ahead

As Gandiwa reflected on the future, she asserted the importance of unity among African governments.

“This fight isn’t just about ivory; it’s about our heritage, our economies, our environment and the Africa we want, Africa’s Agenda 2063. We must present a coherent voice to the global community, showcasing that we seek dialogue over discord,” she stated firmly.

Advertisement

The call for Africa to present itself as a rational and united front on wildlife conservation is urgent, especially in a world that increasingly values partnerships and mutual understanding.

Concluding her reflections, Professor Gandiwa expresses profound optimism about the innovative solutions African nations can create together.

“The conversation surrounding the ivory trade ban is one that needs to evolve,” she declares.

Advertisement

“We must focus on sustainability and coexistence rather than perpetuating cycles of exclusion/ isolation. The implications of these negotiations extend far beyond wildlife; they underscore our commitment to the economic well-being and our communities,”

“Together, we can solve this ivory dilemma under CITES and the current ‘stale mate’ can be resolved effectivelythrough deliberate efforts of the African Group of Negotiators on Wildlife and the CITES institutional infrastructure & robust decision making machinery.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

In the community

Hwange West MP demands urgent action after two killed by elephants in Victoria Falls

Published

on

BY NOKUTHABA DLAMINI 

VICTORIA FALLS – Hwange West legislator Vusumuzi Moyo has called for urgent and decisive intervention to address escalating human-elephant conflict after two people were killed by elephants in Victoria Falls within the space of a week.

Advertisement

Rising on a point of national interest in the National Assembly, Moyo said the recent deaths had left families in mourning and exposed the growing danger faced by communities living near wildlife corridors.

“In closing, Mr Speaker Sir, I want to convey my message to two families within Victoria Falls. This happened within a week. They lost their lives because of this conflict,” Moyo said. “In a space of a week, two families are mourning the loss of their loved ones.”

Victoria Falls and surrounding communities, which border wildlife areas, have in recent years experienced increased incidents of elephants straying into residential areas, destroying crops and infrastructure, and in some cases fatally attacking residents.

Advertisement

Moyo told Parliament that the crisis must no longer be viewed solely as a conservation issue but as a matter of human dignity and national development.

“My issue is not merely about wildlife management. It is about national development, constitutional responsibility and ultimately, protecting human dignity,” he said.

He warned that communities from Kariba to Binga, and in tourism corridors around Victoria Falls, are “under siege” from escalating human-elephant conflict.

Advertisement

“Families are losing crops, infrastructure is being destroyed and tragically, lives continue to be lost. This House cannot ignore the cries of rural citizens who coexist with wildlife every day,” Moyo said.

The Hwange West MP defended previous government decisions to cull elephants in high-conflict zones, arguing that such measures were sometimes necessary to restore ecological balance and protect human life.

“These are not acts of recklessness but acts of necessity because conservation must never come at the expense of human survival,” he said.

Advertisement

While acknowledging the importance of non-lethal measures such as fencing and translocation, Moyo said in some areas those interventions were no longer sufficient on their own.

He urged authorities to urgently implement provisions of the Parks and Wildlife Act, promulgated on 28 November 2025, particularly in communities bordering national parks.

“It is my sincere hope that the implementation of the Parks and Wildlife Act… will be taken to the areas that border within national parks so that people appreciate and that the regulations can be done as fast as possible,” he said.

Advertisement

Moyo stressed that Parliament must strike a balance between conservation and protecting human life.

“The people are not asking Parliament to choose between elephants and human beings. They are asking us to restore the balance,” he said.

The latest fatalities have renewed debate in Victoria Falls over how authorities can better safeguard residents while maintaining Zimbabwe’s strong conservation reputation.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

In the community

Grace-and-Favour: Binga RDC builds $200k lakeside mansion for CEO despite government ban

Published

on

BY TANAKA MREWA

In a district where hunger drives thousands of children out of school and most households lack basic sanitation, a luxury four-bedroom house with a jacuzzi is nearing completion on the shores of Lake Kariba, built at public expense for the long-serving chief executive of one of Zimbabwe’s poorest local authorities.

Advertisement

An investigation by CITE reveals that Binga Rural District Council (RDC) has spent close to US$200 000 constructing a “grace-and-favour” home for its chief executive officer, Joshua Muzamba, despite a standing government directive prohibiting local authorities from building personal residences for senior officials.

The development has ignited questions about governance, accountability and political protection in a district consistently ranked among Zimbabwe’s poorest, and where residents say public resources are routinely diverted from desperately needed services.

The house sits on a two-acre stand overlooking Lake Kariba, in an exclusive peninsula neighbourhood about six kilometres from Binga town, surrounded by water on two sides.

Advertisement

Council records and sources familiar with the project say the stand, valued at over US$40 000, was allocated to Muzamba free of charge. The property includes four bedrooms – three of them ensuite – a jacuzzi and two garages.

The project’s cost and scale contrast sharply with living conditions in the district.

Official statistics paint a grim picture: ZimStat data shows that 73 percent of households in Binga lack toilets, while many communities travel long distances for schools and healthcare facilities amid largely impassable roads.

Advertisement

Education ministry figures indicate that in 2022 alone, 6 671 pupils dropped out of school, while more than 13 000 children were irregular attendees due to hunger.

Yet despite chronic underdevelopment, council funds have been channelled into the high-end residence.

Muzamba and the council did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Advertisement

A ministry of local government circular issued on October 6, 2014 (Circular CX154) explicitly forbids local authorities from allocating institutional properties to employees, mayors or council chairpersons.

The ministry’s spokesperson Gabriel Masvora confirmed the directive remains in force.

“The government’s wish is to see improved service delivery prioritised in local authorities for the benefit of the people,” Masvora said. “Local authorities are a third tier of government which have systems and controls in place to ensure resources are used effectively.”

Advertisement

He added that councillors should scrutinise expenditures to ensure compliance with government policy and residents’ priorities.

The Association of Rural District Councils of Zimbabwe (ARDCZ), with Muzamba as chair, passed a resolution allowing construction of houses for senior officials after 10 years of service, effectively sidestepping central government policy.

Muzamba has led Binga RDC for 14 years, a tenure marked by recurring controversies.

Advertisement

Fanuel Cumanzala, the MP for Binga South (CCC) describes the CEO as a dominant figure operating with little internal resistance.

“He has become a liability to Binga,” Cumanzala said. “Whatever he does is for personal gain, not for the wellbeing of the people. Councillors are afraid to go against him.”

Cumanzala alleges the CEO survives political pressure because of backing from influential figures with economic interests in the district.

Advertisement

Muzamba lost his position in Zanu PF’s central committee in 2018 after the Supreme Court ruled public officials could not hold multiple posts simultaneously.

Concerns over governance at Binga RDC stretch back years.

In 2018, police requested a full audit of the council after investigations into suspected theft of trust property revealed potential financial irregularities.

Advertisement

The then senior assistant commissioner Stephen Mutamba, now police commissioner general, wrote to the local government ministry recommending a comprehensive audit after police uncovered evidence that council employees were allegedly under-receipting cash.

The subsequent ministry audit found serious weaknesses, including: bank transfers not being recorded in cash books; rampant under-receipting; an absence of an authenticated employment policy, exposing the council to nepotism and unethical hiring practices; and unsigned council minutes, raising doubts about the authenticity of the records.

Despite these findings, residents say meaningful corrective action never followed.

Advertisement

Muzamba is accused of protecting one employee, Lovemore Siamuyi, who was implicated in earlier investigations and remains employed.

Current and former council insiders allege the CEO has filled the local authority with relatives, claims he has not publicly addressed.

A council official, speaking anonymously for fear of reprisals, said a previous resolution capped staff numbers at 50 due to financial constraints, leading to retrenchments.

Advertisement

“But soon after that, more people started being employed,” the source said. “Now the place is flooded with his kinsmen.”

Employees describe a workplace climate of fear and factionalism.

Residents also question a council resolution allowing senior officials to purchase service vehicles at book value after five years, a policy they say disproportionately benefits senior executives and their associates.

Advertisement

“This means residents effectively buy new vehicles every five years,” said one ratepayer.

The council is reportedly struggling with cash flow, at times paying salaries through allocations of housing stands instead of wages.

Muzamba’s critics argue that such challenges make spending on his luxury house especially difficult to justify.

Advertisement

The Auditor-General has previously warned that similar practices elsewhere risk undermining service delivery. In 2022, Marondera RDC was flagged after building a CEO residence using capital development funds. The Auditor-General cautioned that “service delivery may be compromised as council funds are used for unintended purposes.”

Matabeleland North Minister Richard Moyo said his office had received no formal complaints about corruption at Binga RDC.

“We haven’t received any official reports pertaining to this matter,” he said, suggesting some allegations could be politically motivated disputes between councillors from different parties.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the government says a Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission (ZACC) taskforce is examining corruption allegations across local authorities.

“If there are any reports made, the committee will swiftly look into the issues,” Masvora said.

The MP Cumanzala said it was particularly disheartening that communities in Binga remain trapped in poverty despite vast natural resources including Lake Kariba fisheries, forests teeming with wildlife and mineral wealth.

Advertisement

“Binga RDC is one of the worst run in the country in the sense that we have so much resources and a lot of potential and we receive a lot of attention from non-governmental organisations and the government itself, but those resources are being pocketed by certain people,” he said.

SOURCE: CITE

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Slider

Hwange lion DNA helps convict poachers for first time

Published

on

BY BBC

Lion DNA has been used to successfully prosecute poachers for the first time in the world, it has emerged.

Advertisement

Wildlife crime experts have only just revealed how they were able to identify the individual animal from body parts found in a suspect’s village, as they matched a profile on Zimbabwe’s lion database.

A blood sample had previously been taken from the male lion, which was being tracked by authorities in Hwange National Park – using a radio collar.

Two poachers were convicted for the 2024 incident and sent to prison in what is thought to be the first prosecution of its kind.

Advertisement

 

The details of the convictions and the role the DNA database played have been previously unknown.

Non-governmental organisation (NGO) Traffic, which works to combat the illegal trade in wildlife, has shared the detail with us.

Advertisement

In May 2024, authorities in Hwange National Park became suspicious after a radio collar worn by a male lion stopped working.

Investigators and police traced its last known position and found a snare with lion fur attached to it.

After collecting forensic evidence they questioned two men in a nearby village and discovered three sacks of meat, 16 lion claws and four teeth. These body parts would later be tested against the database, with the DNA from all matching the profile of that missing lion.

Advertisement

But possessing lion parts is not necessarily a crime in Zimbabwe.

Having them can be explained away as old, traditional ornaments or as coming from an animal that died of natural causes.

This has been an obstacle to prosecutions in the past.

Advertisement

But thanks to a breakthrough in DNA profiling, that’s now changed.

The lab generated a DNA profile from the recovered body parts and compared this to the profile previously generated from a blood sample of the lion with the radio collar.

The two profiles matched and scientists were able to identify the specific missing animal.

Advertisement

Over the last eight years the Victoria Falls Wildlife Trust (VFWT) has received about £250,000 from the People’s Postcode Lottery in the UK to build up the DNA database of lions in Zimbabwe.

The scientist at the trust, who made the discovery, asked to remain anonymous for his own safety, but said:

“Before we had access to this technology, we were only able to do species identification, but sometimes that’s not enough.

Advertisement

“We can essentially match those claws or those products to the lion of interest that we are looking for.”

Within 10 days of the killing, the DNA evidence was presented in court.

Two men pleaded guilty and were given 24 month prison sentences.

Advertisement

The hearing was told the value of the lion was about $20,000.

Richard Scobey, Traffic’s executive director, said “countries now have the forensic capability to bring, solid science-based evidence to court” and that it will have global impact.

This is understood to be the first time that DNA from an individual lion has been identified and used to prosecute poachers.

Advertisement

Professor Rob Ogden has been closely involved in setting up the project and is co- founder of the organisation Trace, which promotes the use of forensic science in wildlife law enforcement.

He says the prosecution gives “a message of hope” and shows what can be done using a combination of training, research and development and forensic casework.

Recent figures suggest an increase in the number of lions being killed for their body parts which are then sold both as cultural objects in Africa and for traditional Chinese medicine.

Advertisement

It is thought the rise may be down to organised crime gangs also involved in the illegal trade in Rhino horn and ivory trafficking.

In Mozambique between 2010 and 2023, 426 lions were killed as a result of contact with humans with a quarter linked to deliberate poaching.

A measure of the scale of the trade is also the number of seizures by the authorities in recent years.

Advertisement

That includes 17 lion skulls found in Lusaka in 2021, reportedly en-route from South Africa, and a 2023 seizure in Maputo of more than 300kg of lion body parts.

Which is why this breakthrough on DNA identification is seen as sending an important message to would-be poachers.

 

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 VicFallsLive. All rights reserved, powered by Advantage