Connect with us

Slider

Wildlife AGN chairperson reflects on the ivory trade ban and the need for fresh perspectives

Published

on


BY NOKUTHABA DLAMINI

Professor Patience Gandiwa, the newly appointed chairperson of the African Group of Negotiators (AGN) on Wildlife, has emphasized the urgent need for African countries to rethink their ideas and potential solutions around the contentious ivory trade ban.

Advertisement

“Africa needs to reflect deeply on the implications of this ban and work collaboratively to find acceptable (and sustainable) solutions that take into account the diverse perspectives within our African communities,” she asserted.

In a compelling dialogue with VicFallsLive, Gandiwa addressed the pressing issues posed by the ivory trade ban, which has, for a long time now, become a significant point of contention in African nations.

To give a brief background on the subject matter.

Advertisement

Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) banned the international commercial ivory trade in 1989. In 1997, at the 10th Conference of Parties (COP) hosted by Zimbabwe in Harare, a decision was adopted to allow for once-off trade in ivory, recognizing that Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe had healthy populations of elephants, and gave permission for a once-offsale of ivory to Japan in 1999 and financial resources for elephant conservation were raised from legal sales of ivory derived from existing stocks gathered from elephants that died as a result of natural causes or from problem-animal control.

The elephant populations of Botswana, South Africa, Namibia and Zimbabwe are listed in Appendix II of the Convention (which allows for regulated commercial trade), while all other African elephant populations are listed in Appendix I (which prohibits all commercial trade).

Following the once-off sale, a ban of ivory trade was put under CITES in 2008, for 9 consecutive years/3 CoPs (as per annotation) technically lapsed, but still in force as there is no mechanism for such trade under CITES.

Advertisement

This has, over the years, sparked ongoing devisive debates amongst African nations, as they grapple with the implications on ‘both-side-of the-coin’.

Whilst CITES CoP10 (Resolution.10.10) marked a significant step in addressing the complexities of the ivory trade, particularly in the context of the historic establishment of Elephant Trade Information System (ETIS) to monitor and analyze illegal ivory trade trends and the emphasis on better stock management and international cooperation, crucial in the ongoing efforts to combat illegal ivory trade and protect elephant populations, some challenges have persisted.

“The issue of ivory trade has long been a contentious topic,” Gandiwa remarked.

Advertisement

“Currently, there seems to be no one-size-fits-all solution on how we can approach this matter and I believe, through constructive dialogue, we should find practical and sustainable options to explore

“The bottom-line though, we all know that unregulated international trade can push threatened and endangered species to extinction, especially when combined with factors such as habitat loss, human-wildlife conflicts and climate change. We also know that banning trade is also not a panacea as such bans have been enforced for several species and did not necessarily yield desired outcomes.

At the same time there are case studies demonstrating that putting economic value on species can cancreate significant incentives for its conservation and recovery (the Zimbabwean nile crocodile is a good example), and yet still that approach may not work for other species. Therefore, what can we do about the current ivory dilemma under CITES?”

Advertisement

Zimbabwe for example, with its second-largest population of elephants globally, has felt the economic and ecological weight of this restriction acutely.

“As elephants die naturally or are culled due to human-animal conflict, the ivory collected is stored securely,” she explains, emphasizing the implications of the accumulated stockpile.

The country is sitting on over 130 tones of ivory, a figure that has grown since the last sale in 2008. This situation raises urgent questions about how we can address the stockpiling and the challenges that arise from it.”

Advertisement

Advert

Botswana, Namibia and South Africa are facing similar challenges. On the other hand, the status of several African elephant populations remains endangered and critically endangered (as per classification of IUCN for both species of Loxodonta) and still in dire need of concerted efforts and measures to improve the situation. There are seemingly no obvious solutions, and we need to wear our ‘thinking caps’ and confront this matter starting with dialogue.

Gandiwa’s perspective highlighted the necessity for African nations to engage in constructive and collaborative dialogue.

“If Africa agrees to disagree on this contentious issue of ivory stockpiles, we must ask: What alternatives can we explore to create a win-win situation?” she proposes, advocating for a united approach to address conservation challenges while acknowledging the realities of countries across the heterogenous landscape of Africa.

Furthermore, Gandiwa highlighted the recent global shifts in international development assistance, urging African nations to innovate and identify new financing mechanisms beyond trade.

Advertisement

“We can no longer depend solely on traditional funding sources,”.

“We need to explore proposals such as biodiversity credits, recognition of the role of wildlife in climate action and provide the necessary funding to protect Africa’s charismatic wildlife without relying on the traditional sources of financing conservation in light of growing shifts of priorities in the global finance landscapes. Some donor countries are becoming more inward-looking prioritising addressing conflicts and strenghtening securing over environment or wildlife matters.If we can draw inspiration from how carbon credit market and even financial engineering innovations developed over the years, Africa has the capacity to generate the much-needed revenue to finance species conservation. Most of the options however, still rely on functional multilaralism.

Exploring Viable Alternatives

Advertisement

As the discussions deepened, Gandiwa emphasized that multiple alternatives are available even if trade does not emerge as a viable option (at this stage) for all countries ND stakeholdersconcerned. “We have seen a range of proposed solutions in previous negotiations, such as Mobilizing Sustainable Finance For African Elephant Conservation and other endangered species,” she recalls. “Now it is time to take those proposals further— to operationalize them, secure initial capital, and implement innovative strategies that align with our unique challenges.”

She further elaborated on the need for understanding and cooperation within the African Group of Negotiators on Wildlife.

“A debate over whether to allow the ivory trade shouldn’t lead to fragmentation among us. If one party opposes the trade for their own reasons while another seeks to justify it, it doesn’t mean either is wrong. Both perspectives are valid,” she suggested. “What we need to do is recognize these differing views and find workable for solutions that bridge our differences rather than push us further apart.”

Advertisement

Navigating the Path Ahead

As Gandiwa reflected on the future, she asserted the importance of unity among African governments.

“This fight isn’t just about ivory; it’s about our heritage, our economies, our environment and the Africa we want, Africa’s Agenda 2063. We must present a coherent voice to the global community, showcasing that we seek dialogue over discord,” she stated firmly.

Advertisement

The call for Africa to present itself as a rational and united front on wildlife conservation is urgent, especially in a world that increasingly values partnerships and mutual understanding.

Concluding her reflections, Professor Gandiwa expresses profound optimism about the innovative solutions African nations can create together.

“The conversation surrounding the ivory trade ban is one that needs to evolve,” she declares.

Advertisement

“We must focus on sustainability and coexistence rather than perpetuating cycles of exclusion/ isolation. The implications of these negotiations extend far beyond wildlife; they underscore our commitment to the economic well-being and our communities,”

“Together, we can solve this ivory dilemma under CITES and the current ‘stale mate’ can be resolved effectivelythrough deliberate efforts of the African Group of Negotiators on Wildlife and the CITES institutional infrastructure & robust decision making machinery.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

National

EcoCash bill splitting signals rise of social commerce in Zimbabwe

Published

on

BY STAFF REPORTER

EcoCash’s latest bill-splitting feature on its Super App is not just a product upgrade, it is part of a broader shift towards “social commerce,” where financial transactions are embedded directly into everyday conversations.

Advertisement

Traditionally, sending money has been a deliberate, separate action: open the app, enter details, confirm payment. But with EcoCash’s integrated chat environment, that process is being redefined. Payments now happen in the same space where decisions are made — within conversations among friends, families and colleagues.

This development, which is being driven by Sasai Fintech, a subsidiary of Cassava Technologies, result is a more natural flow between communication and commerce.

This model, often referred to as chat-first payments, is gaining traction globally. Platforms such as Venmo in the United States and Revolut in Europe have popularised the idea of embedding payments into social interactions, allowing users to split bills, request funds and settle expenses within a messaging context.

Advertisement

EcoCash’s move signals that Zimbabwe is aligning with — and in some ways accelerating — this global trend.

Unlike many mature markets where card-based payments dominated before social features were layered on, Zimbabwe’s mobile-first ecosystem provides a different foundation. Mobile money is already deeply embedded in daily life, making it easier to integrate financial services into conversational platforms without requiring a behavioural overhaul.

By placing bill-splitting within its chat interface, EcoCash is effectively turning conversations into transaction points. A group discussing dinner plans can now split the bill instantly. Colleagues organising transport can settle contributions in real time. Families coordinating school fees or groceries can move from agreement to payment without leaving the chat thread.

Advertisement

This convergence of messaging and money is at the heart of social commerce.

From a strategic standpoint, the implications are significant. Each conversation has the potential to generate multiple transactions, increasing activity on the platform while strengthening user engagement. Payments become less of a task and more of a seamless extension of communication.

Industry analysts note that this model tends to drive higher transaction frequency and user retention, as financial interactions become habitual rather than occasional. For EcoCash, the bill-splitting feature is a practical entry point into this space, simple enough to encourage adoption, yet powerful enough to shift behaviour.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

National

Zimbabwe’s diplomatic ‘House of Cards’ exposed as funding crisis hits missions

Published

on

File footage retrieved online

BY WANDILE TSHUMA

Zimbabwe’s push to rebrand itself on the global stage is being undermined by a deepening funding crisis that has left key diplomatic missions in disrepair and staff facing eviction threats, lawmakers have warned.

Advertisement

A parliamentary report presented on Tuesday  shows a stark disconnect between rising foreign currency inflows and the deteriorating state of the country’s embassies abroad. While diaspora remittances surged to nearly $1.8 billion in the first three quarters of 2025 and exports jumped 27%, Treasury released only about 60% of the Foreign Affairs Ministry’s budget.  

The shortfall, equivalent to over ZWG1.2 billion, has “critically hampered” operations and stalled infrastructure upgrades at missions meant to anchor Zimbabwe’s international presence, according to the Portfolio Committee on Foreign Affairs.

“The substandard condition of missions… projects an image of resource scarcity and neglect,” the report said, singling out the embassy in Japan as emblematic of the decline.  

Advertisement

Renovation delays in key capitals such as London and Berlin, alongside stalled construction projects in Abuja, have eroded Zimbabwe’s diplomatic standing, lawmakers said. The ministry failed to meet targets to renovate or construct properties, missing at least five planned upgrades by September 2025 due to lack of funds.  

Members of Parliament warned that the deteriorating infrastructure risks sabotaging the government’s “Brand Zimbabwe” campaign, which seeks to attract tourists, investors and trade partners.

“If we want to attract investment and build strong relations, we must present ourselves in a dignified and professional manner,” one lawmaker said during debate, adding that underfunded embassies “do not present the actual face of the country.”  

Advertisement

The crisis extends beyond bricks and mortar. MPs said erratic funding has disrupted day-to-day operations, leaving missions struggling with basic costs such as fuel, ICT support and staff welfare. In some cases, diplomats abroad face “evictions and lockouts” due to unpaid expenses, Parliament heard.  

Underfunding has also weakened Zimbabwe’s ability to assist its citizens overseas and curtailed its participation in global diplomacy. “Underfunded embassies are often unable to assist globally dispersed citizens, even in emergencies,” another MP said.  

The situation has created what analysts describe as a fragile diplomatic architecture — one buoyed by strong economic inflows from the diaspora and export growth, yet hollowed out by fiscal constraints.

Advertisement

The committee noted that while Treasury has provided average monthly reimbursements of about $6.3 million to support missions, the funding gaps have “compromised the Ministry’s performance” and delayed critical projects.  

This contradiction is particularly striking given the government’s emphasis on economic diplomacy. Export earnings reached $8.57 billion between January and November 2025, sharply narrowing the trade deficit, while tourism campaigns under the “Brand Zimbabwe” banner have boosted international arrivals.  

Yet lawmakers cautioned that without adequate and timely funding, these gains could be undermined.

Advertisement

“Funding must not be allocated on paper. It must be released on time. Without that, even the best plans will fail,” one MP said.  

The committee urged Treasury to prioritise full and timely disbursements to restore Zimbabwe’s diplomatic infrastructure, warning that continued neglect could damage the country’s global image and weaken its ability to compete for investment.

“Embassies are the face of the nation,” the report concluded. “Without resources, that face risks becoming a liability rather than an asset.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading

In the community

Zimbabwe moves to support human-wildlife conflict victims

Published

on

BY NOKUTHABA DLAMINI

Cabinet has officially approved a transformative National Wildlife Policy, marking the first major overhaul of the sector’s regulatory framework in over three decades.

Advertisement

For the communities of Matabeleland North—from the elephant-dense corridors of Hwange to the tourism heartbeat of Victoria Falls—the policy promises a radical shift in how local people coexist with and benefit from the country’s natural heritage.

Presented by Finance minister Mthuli Ncube on Tuesday, the new policy acknowledges that the wildlife sector has been “remarkably transformed” since the current laws were enacted in 1992.

The updated framework seeks to align Zimbabwe with modern international best practices, moving toward a “vibrant wildlife-anchored economy” that directly supports national development.

Advertisement

For residents of Hwange and Victoria Falls, the most critical breakthrough is the policy’s explicit focus on human-wildlife conflict (HWC).

The framework provides for the implementation of the Human-Wildlife Conflict Relief Fund, specifically designed to provide benefits and support to victims of wildlife encounters.

This is paired with new regulations for CAMPFIRE (Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources) and the establishment of dedicated wildlife corridors to reduce dangerous interactions between animals and human settlements.

Advertisement

The policy is built upon 10 strategic pillars, including community-based natural resources management and the equitable sharing of benefits.

Crucially, the government now recognises wildlife as a “public resource,” with the policy aiming to support devolution and enhance “active community participation.”

This ensures that present and future generations in Matabeleland North are not just neighbours to the game reserves, but active stakeholders in its socio-economic success.

Advertisement

However, community members say the success of the policy will depend on how effectively benefits are devolved to grassroots level.

“We have heard policies before, but what matters is whether the money reaches us,” said a Hwange villager, Eslina Ndlovu from Nemanhanga. “Our schools are struggling, some do not even have adequate classrooms or learning materials. If wildlife revenue is coming from our areas, it should help improve our education system.”

Another villager,Joseph Mwembe from Vukuzenzele village under Chief Mvuthu, echoed similar sentiments, calling for investment in health services. “We are living with wildlife every day, but our hospitals are not equipped. We don’t have proper referral hospitals or machines. If this policy is serious about supporting communities, then we must see that money building clinics, equipping hospitals, and improving services here in Matabeleland North,” he said.

Advertisement

Villagers stressed that without tangible improvements in infrastructure and social services, the policy risks falling short of its intended impact.

“If communities do not benefit in real terms, then it defeats the whole purpose of calling wildlife a national resource,” added Ndlovu.

The policy also introduces measures for fisheries conservation and the protection of indigenous plant species, with strict penalties for violations that threaten resource sustainability.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 VicFallsLive. All rights reserved, powered by Advantage