BY STAFF REPORTER
As the Zimbabwean government considers culling elephants to provide protein to starving communities, villagers from Matabeleland North province share their thoughts on the controversial plan.
Councilor from Mabale, Eugene Sibanda from Ward 17 welcomes the idea, citing the devastating drought and the need for community development. “We’re tired of the destructions they have done in our communities, they are now too many so their decision to kill is welcomed,” he says. “When will this happen?”
Lenziwe Nyoni from Kamativi has a personal reason for supporting the culling. “Elephants killed my father in 2013,” she says, her voice trembling. “We want compensation and justice. They should kill them.”
Elizabeth Thebe from Chief Mvuthu in Hwange is frustrated with the destruction caused by elephants. “They’re not our cows,” she says. “We’re scared to move around, and they destroy our fields. If the owners want to kill them, that’s alright. They should kill them.”
Daniel Sithole from Green Shango Environmental Trust agrees with the minister’s decision, citing climate change impacts. “We respect international laws on wildlife,” he says, “but human rights come first.”
The proposal to cull elephants in Zimbabwe follows Namibia’s recently announced plans to cull 723 wild animals — including 83 elephants — to mitigate the effects of the drought and distribute the meat to communities facing food shortages.
Elephants are protected by international conventions, such as the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species.
The discussion reveals a complex issue, with some seeing the culling as a necessary solution to food insecurity and others opposing it due to personal experiences, fear, or concerns about implementation.
As the government moves forward with the culling process, some say it’s essential to consider the diverse perspectives and ensure that the decision is made with the best interests of both humans and animals in mind.