Slider
Chiredzi farmers resort to fortified kraals to keep lions, hyenas away
BY NOKUTHABA DLAMINI
Annai Makuyana used to endure sleepless nights trying to protect her livestock from wild animals such as lions and hyenas until she was introduced to the concept of fortified kraals.
Makuyana (62) from rural Chiredzi in south-eastern Zimbabwe said she lost 15 head of cattle and over 21 goats between 2017 and 2020 before she moved away from traditional kraals to predator-proof enclosures to protect her livestock at night.
“Since 2017, I lost 13 of my cows and 21 goats,” she said.
“They used to attack even in the presence of the herders in the grazing areas and I am now left with only five cows and three goats because they were being attacked even inside their kraals.
“In 2020, two of my cows were killed on the same day when a pack of hyenas invaded my kraal and one of the cows was killed inside while the other got attacked just outside the kraal as it tried to escape from the wild animals.
“The sight and smell of the lions intimidates the livestock and causes a stampede that puts the entire herd at risk.”
Makuyana is one of many villagers around the Gonarezhou National Park – one of Zimbabwe’s largest game reserves – who are resorting to fortified kraals to save their livestock from worsening wildlife conflicts.
Conservationists are promoting the use of the fortified kraals to encourage the coexistence of livestock belonging to communal farmers in wildlife corridors and predator animals.
Most rural households in Zimbabwe rely on traditional kraals that merely contain livestock, but fortification of kraals in wildlife corridors such as those around the Gonarezhou game reserve has become necessary to ensure that livestock coexists with free-ranging carnivores.
Typical fortified kraals can be built from locally available materials such as thorn bush or stones.
The Gonarezhou Conservation Trust (GCT), an organisation running the state-owned Gonarezhou National Park, said in 2021 spotted hyenas were responsible for 41% of the livestock that was killed in areas bordering the game reserve as well as conservancy areas such as Malipati, Mapfuka and Jamanda.
It said lions and hyenas accounted for 12% and 14% of the livestock that was killed by predator animals while crocodiles, that often attack during the drinking period, killed 14% of the scale of 250 livestock per population.
GCT said given that wild animals such as lions and hyenas usually attack livestock at night while they were in makeshift traditional enclosures, they resolved to assist communal farmers in wildlife conflict hotspots to make their kraals predator proof.Elice Pheimani, the GCT human wildlife conflict coordinator, said the organisation in 2021 came up with a programme to identify the hotspots and they worked closely with the communities to plan where to put the fortified kraals and then monitor the results.
A number of kraals have since been upgraded to predator-proof status since the project began, resulting in cattle losses from kraals declining by 90% and incidences of livestock killings by lions being reduced for some villagers who have adopted the strategies.
Lexon Makondo, a headman in Mhlanguleni village, is one of the community leaders championing the GCT fortified kraals project and said it had produced significant results for his household.
“We were advised by the GCT to adopt and invest in predator-proof kraals made up of wooden poles,” Makondo said.
“I managed to save money and bought the poles for 10 rand each and with their supervision I managed to set up a kraal that does not leave any spacing in between for these wild animals to encroach.
“Since the construction of the kraal none of my cattle has been killed while inside the kraal.”He said the village has been recording an increase in cases of lions and hyenas that kill livestock, hence the need to invest in protective mechanisms such as fortified kraals.
“The problem of hyenas and lions has been escalating over the past years and these animals often target livestock in and outside the kraals at night or those that graze close to the national park boundary,” Makondo added.
“With these kraals what is even more unique about them is that the poles are closely set and we even use some wire to tighten the poles because hyenas usually take advantage of those traditional kraals that are set without being tightened to attack the livestock.”
The traditional leader said there was a huge uptake for the fortified kraals project as villagers accepted that it was the best way to survive the effects of wildlife conflicts.
“We now have a steady number of people who have taken up the idea and the reports of our livestock being eaten while inside the kraal have gone down by almost 90%, but there are some who still are reluctant to build the predator proof kraals,” Makondo said.
“Protecting cattle at night is just one part of the solution that needs to be adopted by every farmer in this area so that we deal with this problem.
“If cattle are more difficult to prey on in one area that used to be a conflict hotspot, the lions may just move on to another area where the kraals have not been upgraded.”
He called for more innovations to protect livestock during the day in order to eliminate human-wildlife conflicts.
“Additionally, if cattle are only protected at night and allowed to roam unattended during the day, then the predators will target cattle during the day and because lions behaviour, for instance, changes with the seasons, as their natural prey gets easier (dry season) or harder (wet season) to find, thus making cattle more or less attractive for lions at different times of the year,” he added.Pheimani said traditionally farmers allowed their livestock to graze within harvested fields during the mid-dry season to help them survive until the rainfall season and this provided a measure of protection from wild animals during the day.
He said there was still need for sustainable strategies to protect livestock throughout the year.
“We need to come with more strategies on how to counter this challenge and see how livestock can be protected even during these seasons,” Pheimani said.
“Our records prove that most of these animals, including donkeys, are attacked during the grazing period, so investing in predator proof kraals is not yet enough.”
Makondo said most crop farmers in his area were often busy during the cropping season, which meant that they left their livestock unattended and this made them even more vulnerable to attacks by wild animals.
“Kraals that are filled with cattle dung become muddy havens for disease in the wet season, so farmers prefer to let the animals roam outside for their health,” he said.
The government last year said it was introducing a human-wildlife conflict compensation fund, which among other things, will see communal farmers being paid for losses incurred through the killing of livestock by wild animals and destruction of crops.
Wildlife conflicts also claim the lives of people every year in Zimbabwe and the crisis continues to worsen as human settlements encroach into wildlife areas.
BY NOKUTHABA DLAMINI
When l visited South Africa recently with the Zimbabwe Parliament and Wildlife Management Authority delegation, I was taken on a private tour of Boschpoort Predators by Hannes Wessels — President of the South African Predator Association, SUCo-SA member, and one of the industry’s most outspoken defenders. For hours, he walked us through his sanctuary, breeding areas, and off-site hunting properties, offering an unusually frank look into a sector that is often hidden behind controversy and media narratives.
“The youth are our conservationists”
We began in the sanctuary section, where Hannes explained why thousands of schoolchildren visit the property each year.
“On Tuesdays and Thursdays school groups visit us free of charge,” he said. “Our school system in South Africa has no conservation value in the syllabus anymore. The youth are our conservationists, and that’s why it’s important to bring their schools in and take them through the jobs.”
The sanctuary is one of three main sections: the public sanctuary, tiger breeding facilities in the valley, and a mountain breeding area that is closed to visitors.
“We don’t want human imprint on animals that are going into the hunting land,” he explained.
Breeding, hunting and the “Buffer” argument
Hannes spoke openly about the role of the predator-breeding industry in South Africa.
“We need to keep this industry open, because it’s a buffer for the wild populations we’ve got,” he said.
“There’s been unnecessary negativity. People see an animal in a cage and think it’s starving today because of what they see in the media.”
He argued that captive-bred lions reduce pressure on wild reserves, especially as some national parks face disease challenges.
“A specimen like that, you won’t find in our national parks anymore — Kruger is compromised due to disease in the lions. Other metapopulations are under pressure.”
He also highlighted the economic contribution:
“This industry contributes five hundred million to GDP from lion hunting alone,” he said. “If you look at the whole value chain — taxidermy, shipping agents — it makes up to a billion.”
Traditional use and sustainability
Standing beside the enclosures, he spoke about cultural practices involving animal parts:
“Animals are part of traditional medicine in our culture, and there’s nothing wrong with it as long as it’s used sustainably. You cannot change the culture of a nation, but you can teach sustainability.”
The challenge of tiger genetics and DNA markers
At the tiger section, he turned to what he called South Africa’s biggest challenge in tiger management:
“South Africa cannot export tigers to the countries of origin because we haven’t got DNA markers,” he said.
“I can say this is a Siberian, but it’s got Bengal blood — nobody can tell me. That’s the problem: there’s no regulation or DNA system to determine pure lines.”
He mentioned that one of his colleagues is working to change that.
“One of my staff members is working on that to see if we can get tiger markers in, so we can actually determine what we’ve got.”
Traceability
Hannes described a new programme they believe will reshape South Africa’s predator sector:
“We’ve got a new traceability programme, written by one of the best, especially for the lion industry,” he said.
“We can trace a lion from cradle to grave — DNA, parentage, everything.”
This, he said, is crucial for international acceptance:
“The US (United State of America) wants traceability on the product. They don’t just want to know it doesn’t threaten the species — they want enhancement findings. It must prove a benefit.”
He argued that once traceability is universal:
“CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) will open up, because then we can prove we are not busy with inbreeding.”
A database to counter inbreeding claims
He said their internal database already captures detailed lineage:
“I’ve got parentage, I’ve got DNA, I’ve got everything. We can prove we’re not breeding irresponsibly.”
But he added that government itself lacks accurate numbers:
“If you ask the department how many one-year-old male lions we have in captivity, they battle to tell us.”
The new programme aims to force uniform reporting across the industry.
Re-wilding and new conservation fund
Hannes revealed a new initiative:
“Every lion that will be hunted in the future will contribute to a conservation fund,” he said.
“That fund is busy with projects like re-wilding.”
He insisted re-wilding can work:
“They say you cannot re-wild a lion — it’s like teaching a house cat to hunt. We re-wilded lions in 2016, and it’s working.”
Breeding success and natural mortality
He explained that captive-breeding success mirrors natural patterns:
“The success rate is usually four cubs, but there’s a 25% loss. Four will be born, you’ll raise three — one is always lost.”
In nature, he said, mortality is even more brutal due to pride takeovers.
“A new male kills all the cubs because he wants his own blood. That’s why it’s almost impossible for a father to mate with his daughter in the wild.”
Some online images showing thin lions mislead the public, he argued:
“Most of those pictures are lions growing old. They’re not sick — they just go old and starve naturally once they’re chased out.”
The 1984 Smith study: “Putting facts ahead”
Hannes cited the work of Dr Smith, who sedated a number lions in Kruger in 1984 to establish physical averages.
“Smith claims a big lion male should be 1.05 metres at the shoulder,” he said, standing beside one of his large males.
“This one is 1.32 — higher than a normal lion male. That’s the genetics we’re working with.”
He emphasised that quality genetics drive higher industry prices.
Industry scrutiny and advocacy
Hannes believes misinformation is one of the industry’s greatest challenges.
“We are confronted with opinions. We’ve got the science, we’ve got the proof. NGOs are sponsoring opinions and we haven’t got the funding to put the facts out.”
He credited sector associations
“If it wasn’t for Peter, Stephen, and especially Richard — attending meetings, fighting for us — we would have lost this industry a long time ago.”
He dismissed political threats to shut predator farming:
“The wish of the government to close the industry is the same as my wish to win the lottery — it will never happen.”
Inside the facility: Slaughterhouse, hospital, and daily Realities
At one point we passed the onsite veterinary building.
“That’s our hospital where we treat all our animals,” he said. “It’s also the slaughterhouse for carcasses — nothing is wasted.”
He explained they had just processed a horse that had died that morning following an attack with a wildebeest.
Gabi and the nocturnal predators
The tour almost ended with Gabi, a six-year-old predator kept in the sanctuary.
“Normally nocturnal,” Hannes said, “but she’s quite big, and she was hand-raised before being released on the property.”
A controversial but transparent vision
My tour with Hannes revealed a man deeply committed to a model that blends conservation, utilisation, and economic sustainability — a model many organisations and countries intensely debate. He insists that with science, genetics, traceability, and strict record-keeping, the predator-breeding industry can both protect wild populations and support livelihoods.
-
Slider3 years agoInnscor launches brewery to produce Nyathi beer
-
National4 years agoIn perched rural Matabeleland North, renewable energy is vital
-
Tourism and Environment4 years agoStrive Masiyiwa’s daughter opens luxury Victoria Falls lodge
-
Opinion4 years agoA street art mural in Zimbabwe exposes a divided society
-
Special reports4 years agoTinashe Mugabe’s DNA show’s popularity soars, causes discomfort for some
-
National4 years agoVictoria Falls’ pilot dies in helicopter crash
-
National3 years agoCommission of inquiry findings fail to be tabled as Victoria Falls councillors fight
-
National3 years agoHwange coal miner fires workers over salary dispute