Slider
‘Not for the faint-hearted’: The Australian staring down wildlife poachers in Matetsi
Published
3 years agoon
By
VicFallsLive
BY ADAM SHAND
John Gardiner surveys the elephants converging on the waterhole in the late afternoon sun.
Another maternal herd is bustling in from the scrub, and soon every available spot by the water will be occupied.
Gardiner, a 66-year-old with a forthright manner and piercing blue eyes, has an ambivalent relationship with the elephants.
There are too many in the area, he says.
However, their abundance speaks to his vision and the renaissance taking place here.
“It’s only a problem if you can’t throw money at it,” says the Australian-born businessman.
The Gardiner family has thrown a lot of money at stopping the poachers who once overran the 55,000-hectare property, Matetsi Private Game Reserve, which includes a lodge/hotel, Matetsi Victoria Falls, and 15 kilometres of Zambezi River frontage near the falls in Zimbabwe.
Gardiner checks himself, not wanting to sound arrogant, but after four decades building businesses in Africa, he knows this is a fact.
If you don’t back the dream with dollars in Africa, you will not succeed.
Gardiner’s $24 million investment seems brave when you consider that Matetsi (and Zimbabwe) had virtually no revenue from foreign tourists for the two years of the Covid-19 pandemic.
About 80 percent (US$36 million) of the Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority’s annual revenue comes via photographic tourism, mostly foreign-sourced.
In addition, the economic crisis caused by the pandemic increased the threat of poaching, wildlife trafficking and habitat loss through deforestation.
Another global lockdown would be disastrous to governments’ ability to protect wildlife from poaching across southern Africa, according to Gardiner.
“[The poachers] will come again. A bank robber will always go for a bank. As much as you protect it, they’ll take it on, it will be an opportunistic attack.”
A highly organised attack is always possible and Gardiner is preparing for that event by ensuring his team is highly trained and well-equipped to defend itself, this vast wilderness and the wildlife.
“The poachers have guns, and they will take out our people if the reward is there for them,” says Gardiner.
“If there’s an elephant they want and our guy gets in the way, they will shoot him. And that is a fact. The stakes are high.”
As high as the Gardiner family’s ambitions.
Gardiner’s 34-year-old daughter Sara, who co-founded Matetsi in 2015, has a different take on the poaching issue. For her, it’s a question of territory.
“You might say there are too many elephants. I would say there is too little land.”
The African Wildlife Foundation estimates that Zimbabwe loses 20 percent of its natural forest (excluding national parks and private game reserve land) each year to agriculture.
National parks and private game reserves have thus become islands where wildlife congregates. Matetsi, with its abundance of water, is one model for the successful coexistence of humans and animals.
But it’s easy to feel you are coming to Victoria Falls too late.
Zimbabwe’s economic meltdown of 2008 (when inflation hit 89 sextillion per cent) led to an unprecedented destruction of the country’s natural heritage: poachers slaughtered rhino, elephants and countless smaller mammals on an industrial scale.
John Gardiner’s Cessna 210 aircraft makes slow headway over the unyielding grey-green landscape below, until the plume of vapour from the falls comes into majestic view.
Victoria Falls City, 45 minutes by road from Matetsi, is spreading tendrils outwards, but swing to the west and it’s just bush stretching out like a sun-faded canvas.
From the air, this frontier region is seemingly undefendable: a vast wilderness on the Zambezi River wedged between Zimbabwe’s north-western borders with Zambia and Botswana.
It incorporates the Zambezi National Park, as well as a series of sprawling private game reserves leased from the government, including the Gardiners’ Matetsi property, with areas so remote that they remain unexplored by their owners.
A poacher’s paradise.
After touching down at Matetsi’s new airstrip, Gardiner reflects on the past decade since acquiring the lease on the property.
The last leaseholders went broke.
“When I came to Matetsi, all I saw was one trembling impala,” says Gardiner.
“There was nothing. Total devastation.”
Less than five minutes’ drive from the landing strip, we encounter a group of sable antelope ambling across the road.
They seem to have no fear, stopping to watch the vehicle pass by.
Over the next few days, Gardiner visits the 19 boreholes he’s established on the property, which have drawn the wildlife from all around to Matetsi.
“We need to do more boreholes,” he says, watching a 600-strong herd of Cape buffalo jostle for a drink at Gardiner’s Pan.
“It’s like making instant soup; you add water and the animals come in from everywhere.”
Drive out of Matetsi into the Zambezi National Park and, within a few minutes, the profusion of game thins noticeably.
The animals have worked out the limits of their safe haven; they stay close to water.
Gardiner has just taken delivery of 14 waterbuck, an endangered antelope species not seen in the area for decades, a gift from the Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority.
One of the male waterbuck has done his best to destroy an expensive high-fenced enclosure, but all is calm now and the group is ready for release.
This project alone has cost US$40,000.
“The reason we brought the waterbuck on the property is because the riverline is now secure,” says Gardiner.
“We believe we have contained the poaching. We have lifted more than 500 snares off the property, [and] stopped all the netting in the river for the time being.”
Gardiner is building his legacy here, the next project being the return of ostriches.
He vows that when he turns 70 in 2026, there will be black rhino on Matetsi once more.
Sara Gardiner will carry on this work and plans to expand her father’s vision across this frontier with other leaseholders.
Before dawn on a crisp winter’s morning, the Matetsi anti-poaching unit gathers for a patrol.
The unit is called Amaganyane – “wild dogs” in the local Ndebele language – and its members are learning to hunt in a pack like the African painted dogs, the wild canines they protect on Matetsi.
This is a service Gardiner’s guests rarely get to see, but he’s trying to encourage an understanding of the conservation work taking place.
The 50-strong unit patrols around the clock, but there’s an urgency now.
Unarmed poachers from across the river in Zambia, looking to feed their families, pose a daily challenge, and as the dry season wears on and food resources become more limited, incursions become more likely.
Armed criminal gangs that come from further afield to fill overseas orders for ivory are less frequent visitors, but the team is ever-vigilant.
The armourer checks out the radios and semi- automatic AR-15 rifles for the team members and hands squad leader Brian Gurney his .44 handgun, which he carries as a last resort in the event of encountering dangerous game.
The unit is composed of young people from diverse backgrounds: there are former hospitality workers, storemen, security guards and aspiring game guides, most of whom hail from the Victoria Falls region.
It’s Gurney’s job to prepare this patrol for any eventuality.
There’s no chatter or laughter among the scouts, just a quiet resolve. Morale is high; they are waging a just and winnable war on this frontier.
“I think [the poachers] are afraid to come because we are trying by all means to make this place untouchable, whatever the cost,” says Blessmore, a former security guard.
Today, three “sticks” (teams of two) will sweep an area in the north-west of the property, which includes a drainage channel, a favourite incursion point for poachers.
They will investigate two elephant carcasses to establish the causes of death. Not every elephant poacher is after ivory.
The local Zambians want “big-ticket meat items,” says Gurney. At this time of year, when the people are hungry, the poachers are seen as Robin Hood-type thieves and have entire villages backing them.
This is the most prevalent form of poaching in Africa: bush meat for sustenance. Incursions by criminal gangs seeking ivory and other tradable items are much less common, he says.
We come upon the first carcass of an elephant, as dry as an old suitcase, likely dead for several months.
Gurney flips it over. He’s looking for bullet holes, especially around the shoulder, where an experienced hunter will aim, or any cracks in the hide too big for a scavenging hyena to have made.
Nothing sinister to be seen here.
The second carcass is just a few days old; vultures whirl and dive above it.
It’s a bull elephant that used to frequent the campsite and, because he was habituated to humans, an easy target.
The stench is so overwhelming it fills the air and gets into your clothes – you can taste it all day.
Gurney covers his mouth and nose and goes in for a close inspection. He concludes it’s likely to be from natural causes, but can’t say for sure, and we move on.
Zimbabwean-born Gurney returned here from the UK to become involved in wildlife conservation after serving with the Royal Marines in Afghanistan.
He’s protected rhinos in Zimbabwe’s low veld and gone undercover to bust pangolin traders.
His adjustment to civilian life after his Afghanistan tour was challenging, but the mission on Matetsi Private Game Reserve has a clear goal.
“It’s about building an ethos into the team, a value system of courage, determination, loyalty and integrity,” he says.
“Mr G [John Gardiner] is very big on each person taking responsibility and a sense of ownership.
“We are taking young people, some of whom have almost no skills, coming out of high school with not much experience. It’s an opportunity to gain discipline, an understanding of professionalism.”
There are women on the team, including scouts in the field, one of whom is the best shot.
Others are in the control room monitoring a network of hidden cameras across the reserve, keeping tabs on wildlife numbers and the breeding of hyenas and other species.
The use of force is a sensitive issue: not all the interlopers are armed, and the scouts may only fire upon poachers in self-defence. “When we talk to the scouts about poachers, we call them players because, ultimately, it’s a big game,” Gurney says.
“Some of them are kids [from villages across the river] and you can’t treat them like adults. One night we caught a 12-year-old, a 10-year-old and an eight-year-old all sitting wide-eyed in a mokoro [canoe].”
A scout finds an old wire snare, a rare discovery on Matetsi in 2022.
The team has removed more than 500 in the past three years.
The snare is the greatest threat, killing or maiming anything passing by, from an elephant to a warthog.
Each snare found helps Gurney learn more about his enemy.
As he notes, “Families will tag their snares; they will have a little ribbon, a bit of a reed tied with different knots to say, ‘These are ours.’ We have family names now and are in the process of connecting these tags to individuals.”
The poachers have shifted operations to the neighbouring Zambezi National Park, so Gurney is extending patrols there and finding fresh snares.
Later that night, Gurney is at the cliffs by the river that overlook an island.
He can hear a dog barking from a Zambian village just a few hundred metres away.
The river is a maze of inlets and channels giving cover to raiders coming to poach fish and bigger game.
Gurney estimates there are about 30 suspects in that village who are regular visitors and another 15-20 in a village six kilometres downstream, whom he describes as “really evil” customers.
Cultivating sources in their ranks to pass on information is essential to understanding and putting an end to their illegal activities.
Matetsi has a 24-hour-a-day river patrol and maintains covert observation posts along its river frontage.
Gurney’s wife, Stephanie, 32, heads the canine unit and has trained local rescue dogs to track poachers.
The team must also contend with gangs who come to steal power and communications equipment, which are vital to maintaining this safe space.
“There are moments of high adrenalin,” says Gurney.
“Last year, they hit our main repeater station with all our communications, including our Wi-Fi link, and stole all the solar batteries.
“We put our trackers on them, then bounced our guys ahead of them to cut them off.
“We chased them into the national park and they dropped everything – pots, pans, clothes – and we got all our kit back.”
John Gardiner says poaching will only get worse until the Zambian government addresses poverty in the riverside communities.
“They have been hunting here for generations and generations, and they feel, ‘Why should we stop?’
“ It’s the culture: hunting for bushmeat, netting the river until there’s no fish in it.
“Since we put all this protection on the property, everything is being rejuvenated, and they are now looking for softer targets on the river, other properties and other places that are less prepared.
“All we can do is make it as difficult as possible for them to come on the property.
“We’ve had some incidents in the past where they have come across with their AK-47s and there have been firefights on the property historically.”
Non-government organisations are introducing fish farming to the Zambian villagers as an alternative to poaching for sustenance and income.
“The Zambezi River used to bring people together,” says Sara Gardiner.
“It used to be a life source and that’s the way it should be.”
John Gardiner was born in Australia but shaped by Africa.
He came to what was then known as Salisbury, Rhodesia (which he recalls as “a paradise”) in 1978 when most whites, especially foreigners, were making for the exits.
The minority white government was on its last legs and the new democratic nation of Zimbabwe would soon emerge from years of civil war.
Gardiner was born into a military family in Melbourne’s inner city and raised on TV shows like Tarzan, Jungle Jim and Daktari that depicted white men surviving and thriving in Africa.
He left Carlton North’s Princes Hill High at 14 to live with his family in the Greek islands and avoided any formal education thereafter.
Drawing on a love of hospitality, Gardiner started out running a restaurant in Salisbury (now Harare) and has parlayed that into a consumer goods import and distribution business that employs hundreds of people across four countries in the region.
He married Carolyn, an elegant white Zimbabwean, and their twins Sara and Charles were born here. (Charles is the finance planner for the group.)
Gardiner feels more African than Australian these days, but the attitude is still very much North Carlton.
“I’m very proud to be an Australian. I still travel on my Australian passport, but I think now I’m a Zimbabwean at heart, my kids are Zimbabwean.
“Australia is great to visit but look at this – it’s my back garden.”
As Gardiner tours the property, he jokes that every conversation with staff costs him thousands of dollars in new projects.
This week, he’s agreed to widen the bridge to safely accommodate the brand-new fire engine he recently bought for US$150,000.
“Matetsi is the only safari lodge in Africa to have a fire engine,” he says.
“We can lose 5000 hectares to fire in a few hours. As people in Australia know, you need to protect the asset.”
Gardiner wants to correct a perception that Zimbabwe, after decades of misrule and corruption, is doomed.
And that Matetsi is a rich man’s folly.
“With my family, I wanted to showcase everything that was excellent about Zimbabwe.
“We built Matetsi to prove to the world that this is not a third-world basket-case.
“Anyone who doesn’t see this place as a sound investment needs their heads read.
“Done properly, this has become one of the finest properties in Africa.” (Last year, Travel+Leisure magazine rated Matetsi Private Game Reserve as the best resort hotel in Africa.)
“It’s a business – a very big investment,” Gardiner adds.
“We are building this legacy for Zimbabwe and showing people what we can do.”
To safeguard wildlife, there must be a partnership between private capital and government, Gardiner insists.
There are 10 private concession holders operating tourist camps inside the national park and all expect the government to protect the wildlife that draws tourists.
“National Parks, a great bunch of people, just haven’t got the funds available,” he explains.
“So there has to be co-operation between government and the private sector. There has to be a national plan about how we make it work.
“People are looking at Matetsi and saying, ‘This is a centre of excellence, look at what the team are doing there. It’s paying dividends.’
“ I’d love to see the national parks in Zimbabwe privatised, with the government and private sector both being stakeholders.”
Managing egos in Zimbabwe’s competitive wildlife-related industries is a challenge. Kingdoms rise and fall fast and there’s been little co-operation to date, leaving areas like Victoria Falls vulnerable.
Gardiner family money has built Matetsi, but creating a united front against poaching at Victoria Falls will require collaboration with other donors and charities.
Sara has a doctorate in physical chemistry from Oxford University and gave up lucrative opportunities to come home and build Matetsi.
Saving Zimbabwe’s wildlife and creating tourism jobs will help to revitalise the national economy.
“There are five million Zimbabweans living outside the country.
“They want to come back, but haven’t figured out what they’re coming home to,” she says.
“There’s been a terrible brain drain, but slowly we are starting to see people coming back.
“Many South African tourism operations are run by expat Zimbabweans.”
Gardiner’s plan to return black rhino to Matetsi by July 2026 is another huge investment and underlines his faith in Zimbabwe’s future.
He intends to fence 30 square kilometres of land and bring in 24-hour physical and electronic surveillance; the cohort of anti-poaching scouts will triple.
Gardiner knows that returning rhino to Matetsi after 25 years will elevate this place as a target for poaching, and he must meet the cost.
Brian Gurney says Matetsi has created an anchor point of stability, but the poachers will definitely return.
Creating effective deterrence is an arms race that Gardiner must win.
“You have to be a force of nature, you can’t have a soft typhoon,” says Gurney of his employer.
“If you want to be the wind that changes the world, you have to blow strong. We may not have fixed the problem yet but we are dealing with it.
“Coming home to Zimbabwe to help is a fantastic thing to throw your life’s work into. What better thing to do than be out in the bush and do this … and to catch a few bad guys.”
Africa is not for the faint-hearted, says Gardiner.
“I have companies in four African countries.
“I’ve seen American corporates come into Africa and get slaughtered because they reckon they know how to do it, but Africa has its own set of rules.
“I’m just fortunate that the Zimbabwe government allowed me to be the custodian of Matetsi, and I’m not going to let them down.”
He looks out on his favourite waterhole, sipping a glass of sauvignon blanc.
All is peaceful and perfect, until Gardiner notices a young elephant that has lost half its trunk to a poacher’s snare.
Earlier, he grumbled about elephant damage to the forest; now he’s full of defiance and compassion.
“This is why we’re doing this. And why all this game has come to Matetsi.
“We will win this war, no matter what it takes.
“Without these beautiful animals, this is just empty land. I’m a showman and this is the show.” – The Sydney Morning Herald
You may like
Slider
Human-wildlife conflict in Zimbabwe is a crisis: who is in danger, where and why?
Published
2 days agoon
January 16, 2026By
VicFallsLive
BY BLESSING KAVHU
In the fishing villages along Lake Kariba in northern Zimbabwe, near the border with Zambia, everyday routines that should be ordinary – like collecting water, walking to the fields or casting a fishing net – now carry a quiet, ever-present fear. A new national analysis shows that human-wildlife conflict in rural Zimbabwe has intensified to the point where it has become a public safety crisis, rather than simply an environmental challenge.
Between 2016 and 2022, 322 people died in wildlife encounters. Annual fatalities climbed from 17 to 67: a fourfold increase in just seven years. These fatal encounters are concentrated in communities that live closest to protected areas and water bodies. Here, people and wildlife compete for space and survival.
Protected areas and rivers provide water, forage and shelter for wildlife. Rural households rely on the same landscapes for farming, fishing and domestic water. The study shows that this overlap between human activity and wildlife movement sharply increases the risk of fatal encounters.
Historically, human-wildlife conflict research and policy in southern Africa focused on economic losses such as destroyed crops, livestock predationand damaged infrastructure. Fatal attacks on people were often treated as rare or incidental. This study shifts that perspective by showing that human deaths are not isolated events, but a growing and measurable pattern that demands urgent attention.
I am a US-based Zimbabwean scientist working with Zimbabwean conservationists. We analysed national wildlife-related fatality records from the Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority. The central questions were: how many people are dying from wildlife encounters, where are these deaths occurring and which species are responsible?
The findings were stark. Fatal encounters are rising rapidly, are geographically clustered in the north and western districts, and are driven primarily by two species: crocodiles and elephants (not lions, as people might expect). The implications extend beyond conservation to include trauma, fear, retaliatory killings of wildlife and the need for targeted, locally specific interventions.
Patterns in the data
The study reveals that more than 80% of recorded deaths involved only two species, elephants and crocodiles. Crocodiles alone were responsible for slightly more than half of all fatalities. Many of these incidents happened during activities people cannot avoid: fishing, crossing rivers, bathing, or washing clothes in rivers and lakes. These encounters are sudden and often impossible to anticipate, especially in places where visibility is poor and safe water access is limited.
Elephants were responsible for nearly a third of the deaths. These happened mainly during crop-raiding incidents or when communities attempted to chase elephants from fields and homesteads, or when people were walking to school and work. These confrontations often occur at night or in the early morning when visibility is low. Lions, hyenas, hippos and buffalo contributed only 17% of fatal incidents during the study period.
The rise in lethal encounters appears to be driven by several overlapping forces. Zimbabwe still holds one of Africa’s largest elephant populations, estimated at over 80,000 animals. This is second only to Botswana. In dry years elephants move over long distances in search of water and forage, increasing their presence in communal lands. Shrinking natural habitats and growing rural populations mean that human populations are expanding into wildlife corridors. Climate change, particularly recurring droughts, intensifies the competition for water and space.
The geography of the fatalities reveals a clear pattern. Most deaths occurred in Kariba, Binga and Hwange. These are districts along the country’s northern and western frontier, with a combined population of about 343,264 people. They have large water bodies that support abundant crocodile populations; they are close to protected areas with high elephant numbers; and people there depend heavily on farming, fishing and natural resource use.
How people feel
These encounters leave people with fear. Parents become anxious about children walking to school, farmers worry about tending crops at dawn and communities may avoid crossing rivers.
But people aren’t getting mental health support. So grief and fear can turn into anger, often resulting in killings of wildlife. A destructive cycle undermines conservation and damages trust between communities and authorities.
What to do about it
Different places face different dangers, and solutions should reflect that.
Areas near crocodile-prone rivers need safe water access and crossing points and redesigned community washing areas. Districts where elephants are responsible for most fatalities require better early-warning systems, community-based monitoring networks and low-cost methods to deter elephants from crop fields. These measures must be paired with community education and consistent follow-up support.
The findings highlight that coexistence will not be possible without recognising the emotional and psychological dimensions of living alongside wildlife. The responsibility lies with government agencies working with communities. These must be supported by conservation organisations and health services. Counselling, community healing processes and long-term engagement can help break the retaliatory cycle.
Research from other African settings shows that targeted solutions grounded in community involvement and local risk patterns are key to reducing conflicts. In northern Kenya, community-based early warning systems that alert villagers to elephant movements have significantly reduced fatal encounters. Beehive fences and chili-based barriers have helped protect crops without harming wildlife.
In Uganda’s Murchison Falls area, surveys found that local people preferred physical exclusion measures and the relocation of specific crocodiles as ways to lower the risk of attacks. In South Sudan’s Sudd wetlands, communities identified crocodile sanctuaries as one way to reduce dangerous interactions. In Zambia’s lower Zambezi valley, villagers highlighted the need for more alternative water access points (such as boreholes).
These examples show that fatal encounters are not inevitable. When interventions are matched to the species involved and the daily realities of local communities, both human deaths and retaliatory killings of wildlife can be reduced.
Zimbabwe’s wildlife remains a source of national pride and a cornerstone of tourism. But conservation cannot succeed if the people who live closest to wildlife feel unprotected or unheard. A future where people and wildlife thrive together depends on acknowledging that human wellbeing is inseparable from the wellbeing of the ecosystems they share.
SOURCE: THE CONVERSATION
BY RHETT AYERS BUTLER
SUMMARY:
- A recent Nature paper argues that many persistent failures in conservation cannot be understood without examining how race, power, and historical exclusion continue to shape the field’s institutions and practices.
- The authors contend that conservation’s colonial origins still influence who holds decision-making authority, whose knowledge is valued, and who bears the social costs of environmental protection today.
- As governments pursue ambitious global targets to expand protected areas, the paper warns that conservation efforts risk repeating past injustices if Indigenous and local land rights are not recognized and upheld.
- To address these challenges, the authors propose a framework centered on rights, agency, accountability, and education, emphasizing that more equitable conservation is also more durable.
Conservation often presents itself as a technical enterprise: how much land to protect, which species to prioritize, what policies deliver results. A recent paper in Nature argues that this framing misses something fundamental. Many of the field’s most persistent failures, the authors contend, cannot be understood without confronting how race, power, and historical exclusion continue to shape conservation practice today.
The paper, A Framework for Addressing Racial and Related Inequities in Conservation, does not claim that conservation is uniquely flawed, nor that injustice is universal across all projects. Its argument is narrower and more pointed. Modern conservation, it says, emerged from a colonial context that treated land as empty and people as obstacles. Those assumptions were never fully dismantled. They survive in subtler forms, influencing whose knowledge counts, who bears the costs of protection, and who decides what success looks like.
The authors, led by Moreangels Mbizah of Wildlife Conservation Action in Zimbabwe, trace conservation’s institutional roots to the late nineteenth century, when protected areas were established across colonized landscapes through forced removals and restrictions on customary land use. Indigenous peoples and rural communities were often excluded in the name of preserving “pristine” nature. Although conservation has evolved since then, the paper argues that these early patterns still shape present-day practice through what it calls “path dependencies”: inherited norms that continue to privilege outside expertise and centralized control.
One consequence, according to the authors, is the persistent marginalization of Indigenous peoples and local communities, particularly in the Global South. These groups are frequently described as “stakeholders” or “beneficiaries” rather than rights-holders with authority over their lands. The language may sound neutral, the paper suggests, but it often masks unequal power relationships. Even well-intentioned projects can reproduce older hierarchies if communities are consulted only after priorities are set, or if participation is limited to implementation rather than decision-making.
The paper pays particular attention to the current push to expand protected areas to cover 30% of the planet by 2030. In principle, the authors argue, this target could support more pluralistic forms of conservation, including Indigenous-managed territories and community conservancies. In practice, they warn, countries lacking legal mechanisms to recognize customary land rights may default to state-led models that repeat earlier injustices. Conservation success, measured narrowly through ecological indicators, can come at high social cost when human rights are treated as secondary concerns.
Another theme the authors examine is the way conservation narratives value animals and people. Campaigns aimed at audiences in Europe and North America often focus on the moral worth of individual animals, sometimes in ways that implicitly devalue the lives of people who live alongside wildlife. When human–wildlife conflict results in injury or death, local suffering may receive little attention, while the killing of a charismatic animal can provoke global outrage. The authors argue that such asymmetries are not incidental; they reflect deeper processes of “othering” that shape whose lives are seen as grievable or deserving of protection.
The paper is careful not to frame these dynamics as purely racial in a narrow sense. Instead, it emphasizes intersections of race, class, geography, and political power. Urban elites in low-income countries, the authors note, may exercise authority over rural communities in ways that mirror global North–South inequalities. Conservation led by local actors is not automatically just. What matters is how power is distributed and whether affected communities retain meaningful agency.
To address these patterns, the authors propose what they call the RACE framework: Rights, Agency, Challenge, and Education. The framework is not presented as a checklist or a universal solution. Rather, it is intended as a lens through which conservation organizations, researchers, and funders might examine their own practices.
Rights, in this framing, are foundational. The paper argues that conservation cannot be sustainable if it undermines basic human rights, including rights to land, culture, and self-determination. Agency follows from this: communities must have real authority over decisions that affect their territories, not merely advisory roles. Challenge refers to the obligation, particularly among powerful institutions and individuals, to speak out when conservation practices cause harm or exclusion. Education, finally, involves confronting conservation’s own history and recognizing knowledge systems that exist outside Western scientific traditions.
The authors stress that this is not about revisiting past wrongs for their own sake. Understanding history, they argue, is necessary to avoid repeating it under new banners. Nor is the framework framed as an attack on conservation itself. On the contrary, the paper insists that conservation outcomes are likely to be stronger when communities closest to the land are recognized as stewards rather than obstacles.
There is a pragmatic strand running through the analysis. Conservation, the authors note, increasingly operates in a politically fragmented world, with declining public funding and growing skepticism toward international institutions. Projects that lack local legitimacy are more vulnerable to conflict and reversal. Addressing inequities, in this sense, is not only an ethical concern but also a strategic one.
The paper does not pretend that change will be easy. Power, once accumulated, is rarely surrendered voluntarily. Nor does it suggest that conservation can resolve broader social injustices on its own. Its claim is more modest, and perhaps more demanding: that conservation must stop treating inequality as an external issue and recognize how deeply it is woven into the field’s own structures.
For a discipline accustomed to measuring success in hectares and population counts, this is an uncomfortable proposition. But the authors’ central point is straightforward. Conservation is about relationships—between people and nature, and among people themselves. Ignoring those relationships does not make them disappear. It only ensures that their consequences are felt later, often by those with the least power to absorb them.
SOURCE: MONGABAY
National
Government warns farmers to step up tick control as January Disease threat looms
Published
3 days agoon
January 15, 2026By
VicFallsLive
BY STAFF REPORTER
The Ministry of Lands, Agriculture, Fisheries, Water and Rural Development has urged livestock farmers across Zimbabwe to heighten disease surveillance and tick control measures as the 2026 rainy season continues, warning of an increased risk of January Disease (Theileriosis).
In a farmer advisory posted on the Ministry’s official Facebook page, authorities said the tick-borne disease spreads rapidly under warm and wet conditions and can decimate entire cattle herds if not effectively controlled.
The Ministry emphasised that weekly cattle dipping is mandatory during the rainy season, in line with Government policy to curb the spread of the brown ear tick, the primary carrier of January Disease. Farmers were urged to pay dipping levies, ensure correct acaricide dilution as per manufacturers’ instructions, and utilise spray races where possible for improved effectiveness.
In high-risk areas or during active outbreaks, farmers may be directed to follow a 5:5:4 dipping regime, involving more frequent dipping intervals. The Ministry also recommended the use of tick grease on sensitive areas such as inside the ears, the udder and under the tail.
As part of broader prevention efforts, the Ministry said the locally produced BOLVAC vaccine is now available in increased quantities, with farmers encouraged to contact their local veterinary offices to access the vaccine.
Farmers were further advised to conduct daily inspections of their cattle and remain alert to early warning signs of January Disease, which include swollen lymph nodes, loss of appetite, breathing difficulties, frothing, watery or cloudy eyes, fever and general weakness.
The Ministry reminded farmers that all suspected cases or sudden cattle deaths must be reported to the Directorate of Veterinary Services within 24 hours, stressing that the movement of sick or tick-infested animals is prohibited as it contributes to the spread of the disease.
Failure to comply with dipping regulations constitutes an offence under the Animal Health Act, with penalties that may include fines or arrest, the Ministry warned.
Farmers requiring assistance or wishing to report suspected cases were advised to contact their local Veterinary Extension Officer or the Ministry of Lands, Agriculture, Fisheries, Water and Rural Development.
“Prevention saves wealth,” the Ministry said, urging farmers to take proactive measures to protect their herds.
Trending
-
Slider3 years agoInnscor launches brewery to produce Nyathi beer
-
National4 years agoIn perched rural Matabeleland North, renewable energy is vital
-
Tourism and Environment4 years agoStrive Masiyiwa’s daughter opens luxury Victoria Falls lodge
-
Opinion4 years agoA street art mural in Zimbabwe exposes a divided society
-
Special reports4 years agoTinashe Mugabe’s DNA show’s popularity soars, causes discomfort for some
-
National4 years agoVictoria Falls’ pilot dies in helicopter crash
-
National3 years agoCommission of inquiry findings fail to be tabled as Victoria Falls councillors fight
-
National3 years agoHwange coal miner fires workers over salary dispute
