Connect with us

National

China’s pledge may hurt Zimbabwe’s coal plans

Published

on

BY JEVANS NYABIAGE

If there is a country likely to be hurt the most by President Xi Jinping’s decision for Beijing to stop building new power plants overseas, it is Zimbabwe.

Advertisement

Among several African countries with large deposits of coal, it is heavily dependent on China after it had sanctions imposed on it by the United States and some European countries because of former president Robert Mugabe’s human rights abuses and policy of seizing land from white farmers.

It was planning to build several coal-fired power plants costing a total of US$15 billion, with Chinese lenders initially committed to them.

Private funding was not forthcoming, partly because of growing opposition from environmental campaigners.

Advertisement

But on Tuesday, in a pre-recorded speech to the United Nations General Assembly, Xi sounded a death knell for several coal projects, including in Zimbabwe, for which Chinese lenders were expected to provide financing.

The southern African nation’s demand for power exceeds its supply, causing it to seek to build more plants.

Its electricity shortage means it cannot attract power-intensive manufacturing companies.

Advertisement

Xi’s pledge could halt dozens of coal power projects in Africa, although there had already been a notable slowdown in new financing since Xi last year announced a target for net-zero emissions by 2060.

China is the single largest financier of coal-powered plants overseas as well as the largest producer and consumer of coal.

But Beijing has not funded any coal projects abroad in the first half of this year and the country’s largest financier of such projects, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, said it would start phasing out coal from its portfolio.

Advertisement

The bank in July declined to fund the US$3 billion Sengwa coal project, in Zimbabwe’s north, as pressure grew from activists and communities.

Independent climate change think tank E3G says Zimbabwe is among the laggards – also including Botswana and Mozambique – who continue to pursue coal-fired plants, bucking the global trend of retiring or not funding the environmentally destructive energy source.

The Zimbabwean government has been vocal in its continued pursuit of new coal, even as Chinese financiers pull out, E3G said in its latest report about the collapse of the global coal pipeline.

Advertisement

The country has 990 megawatts of coal power plants under construction and 4.5GW in the pipeline, but the Chinese government’s freeze on funding them is likely to force it to seek alternative sources of financing or shift to solar and hydro power.

Besides Zimbabwe, Botswana and Mozambique, other countries that may be forced by China’s pivot to stall their coal plant plans include Kenya, Djibouti, Madagascar, Malawi and South Africa.

Xi’s statement means “existing and agreed projects will be honoured but new projects will be off the table”, according to Yun Sun, director of the China programme at the Stimson ­Centre in Washington. Groundwork, an environmental justice organisation working in South Africa, welcomed Xi’s statement, calling it a victory for the thousands of community activists in countries including Zimbabwe, Kenya, Ghana, Senegal, Ivory Coast and South Africa who had “challenged their governments and China, and said no to coal”. “We challenge President Xi to end support from all Chinese institutions … that keep Africa’s coal mines, plants and other infrastructure under construction or planned,” Groundwork said.
Lauri Myllyvirta, the lead analyst at the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, said the announcement signalled a major policy shift for China and “leaves no international financing for new coal”.

Advertisement

“Making any new financing or equity investment commitments to coal power projects overseas would be toxic for any Chinese bank or power company,” Myllyvirta said.
“For projects that haven’t yet achieved financial close, that’s likely to be the end of the story.”

However, Myllyvirta said it was not yet clear what forms of involvement in coal power projects had been ruled out, and where the line would be drawn for projects that were already initiated. According to Boston University Global Development Policy Centre, the Chinese state has funded coal projects worth US$43 billion since 2000, mainly in Asia and southern Africa. “Now that the world’s major governments have led by example and banned overseas coal plants, it is time for the private sector, which finances 87 per cent of overseas coal, to follow suit,” said Kevin Gallagher, the centre’s director. “We will not meet our global climate and development goals if the private sector continues to finance overseas coal.”
Christoph Nedopil Wang, the founding director of the Green Belt and Road Initiative Centre, said Chinese financial institutions and engineering companies had historically been an important source of financing and engineering capacity for overseas coal development.

“The door has been shut to [governments] in coal-rich countries to ask for Chinese financing and engineering in new coal projects,” Wang said. But he said there was not yet clarity on whether the announcement would halt already announced coal-fired projects. Rishikesh Ram Bhandary, a climate finance and international climate negotiations expert, said China’s decision was “likely to bolster the voices calling for a greater focus on renewables within these countries”. However, he said it was unlikely to have an immediate impact on South Africa and Zimbabwe. “As our database shows, the coal-fired power plants funded by the Chinese policy bank are already under construction or in operation,” he said.
“Of course, we need further details from the Chinese government to fully understand what the announcement includes and excludes.

Advertisement

“With the last source of major public finance for coal-fired power plants being removed, countries such as South Africa and Zimbabwe will need to think carefully about the policies they need, and the infrastructure required to significantly scale up renewables.” – China Morning Post

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

National

Parliament debates disputed chiefdoms across the country

Published

on

 

BY STAFF REPORTER 

Parliament has raised concern over increasing disputes over traditional leadership, with lawmakers warning that contested chiefdoms are undermining governance and development in rural communities.

Moving a motion in the National Assembly, Hwange West MP, Vusumuzi Moyo said the growing number of chieftainship disputes posed a threat to peace and cultural heritage.

“I rise today to debate on a matter which I believe is a matter of national importance, the growing prevalence of disputed chiefdoms across Zimbabwe and the serious threat that these poses to peace, governance, development, and the preservation of our cultural heritage,” Moyo told Parliament. 

He said many disputes date back to distortions created during the colonial period.

“Some of these disputes… emanate from colonial times… when the colonial masters moved in. When they moved in, we already had governing structures,” he said. 

Moyo also referenced communities in Hwange District, saying colonial relocations disrupted traditional governance systems.

“I remember in the constituency that I come from, most of these people… had been resettled from far-off lands, fertile lands, and dumped in Hwange District,” he said. 

He warned that unresolved leadership disputes weaken governance at grassroots level.

“Madam Speaker, when a chiefdom becomes disputed, those constitutional functions grind to a halt. Customary courts lose legitimacy. Land allocations become contested. Development programmes stall,” he said. 

Moyo urged Government to establish clearer succession procedures for traditional leaders.

“It is my sincere hope that… we could start the conversation of trying to restore our culture by providing the necessary legislation to make sure that we cure all this,” he said.  

Continue Reading

National

Rising Zambezi flows lift Kariba water levels amid improved rains

Published

on

BY WANDILE TSHUMA

Water levels at the Kariba Dam are gradually rising following improved rainfall across the Zambezi River Basin, bringing cautious optimism for water availability and power generation.

In a hydrological update released Tuesday, the Zambezi River Authority said the Lake Kariba reservoir level had reached 477.74 metres above sea level as of 10 March 2026.

Usable live storage now stands at 15.57 percent, equivalent to about 10.08 billion cubic metres of usable water.

The Authority said the increase is being driven by improved rainfall across much of the Kariba catchment during the 2025/2026 rainy season, which has boosted river flows and inflows into the reservoir.

“This reflects an improvement compared to the same date in 2025, when the reservoir stood at 476.93 metres above sea level with usable live storage of 9.87 percent,” the Authority said.

Zambezi flows rising at key monitoring points

River flows are also increasing at key monitoring stations along the Zambezi River.

At the Chavuma Gauging Station, flows reached 3,058 cubic metres per second on 10 March 2026, significantly higher than 2,088 cubic metres per second recorded during the same period last year.

Flows have also risen sharply near Victoria Falls, a key tourism and hydrological monitoring point.

At the Victoria Falls (Nana’s Farm) Gauging Station, river flows increased to 1,645 cubic metres per second, compared to 871 cubic metres per second on the same date in 2025.

The Authority said the upward trend reflects stronger rainfall upstream and around the Victoria Falls area, which is feeding the Zambezi system.

Outlook

The Zambezi River Authority said it will continue monitoring rainfall patterns and inflows across the basin to guide water utilisation at hydropower stations linked to the Kariba Dam.

The reservoir is a critical source of electricity for both Zimbabwe and Zambia, which jointly own and manage the dam through the Authority.

Continue Reading

National

Parliament flags dozens of council by-laws as unconstitutional

Published

on

 

BY NOKUTHABA DLAMINI

Subheading:

Legal committee says several statutory instruments exceed legal powers, impose excessive fines and create room for arbitrary charges.

Story:

The Parliament of Zimbabwe has raised alarm over dozens of local authority by-laws, warning that many of them violate the Constitution and the laws under which they were created.

In an adverse report, the Parliamentary Legal Committee said several statutory instruments gazetted in October 2025 are ultra vires, meaning they exceed the legal powers granted under the Urban Councils Act and the Rural District Councils Act. 

The by-laws affect a number of local authorities including Masvingo, Plumtree, Shurugwi, Chimanimani, Chivi and Insiza.

According to the committee, some of the regulations were improperly enacted because the minister responsible for local government made the by-laws directly instead of councils, which are legally mandated to draft them before submitting them for ministerial approval. 

“The by-law making authority is the council, not the minister,” the report states, adding that the process set out in the law was not followed. 

The committee also flagged excessive penalties in some statutory instruments. Under existing legislation, fines imposed through council by-laws should not exceed Level Five on the standard scale of fines — about US$200. However, some by-laws impose penalties ranging between US$500 and US$5,000, which lawmakers said violates the enabling legislation. 

Another major concern is that several by-laws require residents to pay permit or licence fees without specifying the amounts, creating legal uncertainty.

Lawmakers warned that leaving such fees undefined could allow authorities to impose arbitrary charges, potentially opening the door to corruption and abuse of power. 

The committee also highlighted constitutional concerns in some provisions, including those that allow councils to seize property or evict residents without court oversight, which may violate constitutional protections against arbitrary deprivation of property and unlawful eviction. 

In its conclusion, the committee said the statutory instruments are inconsistent with both the Constitution and the Acts of Parliament that empower local authorities, recommending that the laws be reviewed and amended to comply with constitutional and legal requirements. 

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 VicFallsLive. All rights reserved, powered by Advantage