Connect with us

Slider

Zimbabwe’s bid to reopen ivory trade rejected

Published

on

BY NOKUTHABA DLAMINI

Efforts by Zimbabwe to open trade in elephant leather and ivory failed in a vote at 19th Conference of the Parties (CoP19) in Panama after 85 percent of global countries opposed the move, arguing that it will fuel wildlife crimes. 

Advertisement

The proposal, if successful, would have allowed the sale of ivory from national stockpiles of Zimbabwe, Botswana, Namibia and South Africa which they argued that the profits from the sales were going to benefit communities and support the conservation of wildlife. 

Zimbabwe says it is sitting on a stockpile worth US$600 million that needs to be disposed of, but it failed to achieve the two-thirds majority required to pass. 

“Swift on the heels of the defeat to re-open trade, Parties at Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) CoP19 voted against uplisting of all elephant populations, maintaining the status quo and the ongoing challenge of differing levels of protection across the range of African elephants,” Environmental Investigation Agency organization said in a statement.

Advertisement

Only 15 governments voted in favour, 83 against, with 17 abstentions.

IFAW deputy President of Conservation, Matthew Collis in another statement said it welcomed the decision which it says will prevent the poaching of elephants for their tusks.

“We have seen the devastating effect of the ivory trade on elephant populations across the world that have been ruthlessly targeted by poachers,” Collins said.

Advertisement

“Any legal ivory trade provides opportunities for criminals to launder poached elephant ivory into the market.

“Much progress has been made in recent years to close down remaining ivory markets, so we are pleased this decision does not undo such progress.”

“We are sympathetic to the countries seeking to generate income for conservation, but we must find ways to do so without exposing elephant populations to the risk of further poaching,”Collins noted.

Advertisement

“Sadly, governments look likely to refuse  such an opportunity at this very meeting, given the lack of agreement earlier today for a proposal put forward by Kenya to set up a fund to support elephant conservation in exchange for destruction of ivory stockpiles.”

A similar proposal was rejected at the previous CITES conference in Geneva in 2019

 Meanwhile, countries such as Kenya’s have proposed setting up a Convention on International Trade in a working group to explore the feasibility of “Establishing a fund accessible to range states upon non-commercial disposal of ivory stockpiles”.

Advertisement

The fund will be envisaged by making resources available to support elephant conservation and research programs, as well as for livelihoods and economic development programs.

“There has never been a better time to find a new approach to supporting elephant range states in their conservation initiatives, ”

“There was a disastrous increase in poaching across Africa after the last ivory stockpile sales in 2008, and there are no obvious buyers this time around.

Advertisement

“IFAW is pleased that Governments at CITES have chosen to reject repeating that failed experiment, but we urge CITES governments to explore more innovative ways to get resources to elephant range states to protect their wildlife.” Collis concluded.

CoP19 is scheduled to run until Friday.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

National

Government to equip Mpilo Hospital with radiotherapy machines funded by sugar tax initiative

Published

on

BY WANDILE TSHUMA 

Patients in Matabeleland North who rely on specialized care in Bulawayo are set to benefit from a major upgrade in cancer treatment facilities, as the government begins deploying equipment funded by the national sugar tax.

Advertisement

The Deputy Minister of Health and Child Care, Sleiman Timios Kwidini, confirmed to Parliament that the Treasury has released approximately $30.8 million to procure critical radiotherapy machines. Two low-energy units are earmarked for the country’s major referral centers, specifically Mpilo Central Hospital in Bulawayo and Parirenyatwa Hospital in Harare.

Advanced payments have been made to suppliers, and the government confirmed that installation is currently in progress alongside the preparation of specialized treatment bunkers. Kwidini described the move as a significant milestone intended to reduce patient waiting times and the costly need for referrals to facilities outside the country.

However, the announcement met with sharp criticism from lawmakers who argued the ministerial update lacked sufficient detail regarding the total revenue collected and the specific types of equipment purchased.

Advertisement

Surrender Kapoikilu led the debate, questioning whether the ministry had secured essential components like linear accelerators and diagnostic tools like endoscopes. He warned that without adequate surge protection, the high-tech equipment remains at risk from power fluctuations. “ZESA currents have many surges,” Kapoikilu said. “If you just plug it in, in five minutes, a machine is gone”.

 

He emphasized that effective treatment must begin with proper diagnosis, stating, “If you cannot diagnose cancer, you cannot conquer”.

Advertisement

The discussion expanded to include the dire state of basic patient care, with Corban Madzivanyika pointing out that referral centers often lack fundamental tools. “You get to the hospital and you are told that there is no wheelchair,” Madzivanyika told the House, describing the shortage of stretchers and wheelchairs as embarrassing.

Responding to the concerns, the Acting Speaker, Joseph Tshuma, directed the ministry to defer the matter and return with a more comprehensive dossier detailing the expenditure and the availability of essential medicines.

 

Advertisement

Continue Reading

National

Parliament weighs 40% community share in carbon credit deals

Published

on

BY NOTHANDO DUBE

Lawmakers in Zimbabwe are debating a comprehensive Climate Change Management Bill that supporters say will finally ensure rural communities are no longer “mere spectators” in the multi-billion dollar carbon credit industry.

Advertisement

The Bill, which moved into its second reading, seeks to regulate carbon trading and protect the country’s natural resources from foreign exploitation.

Mutsa Murombedzi delivered a passionate plea for the legislation, arguing that it is a matter of “justice, survival and the dignity of our people”. “Climate change is not a distant stone,” Murombedzi told the House. “It is the flood that we see in Chimanimani, which sweeps away our schools… the heatwave that scotches our communities in Hwange, one silent drought that empties our granaries”.

A major point of contention and hope is the proposed 40% community share in carbon projects. Lawmakers argued that previous projects often left locals with nothing but “tsotso stoves or bicycles” while profits were “repatriated back to their countries, particularly those from the global north”.

Advertisement

Master Makope applauded the move to bring transparency to a sector where deals were often done “without the knowledge of the authorities”.

“By having this policy framework, I believe our people are going to benefit,” Makope said.

“The Minister has to make sure that the villagers, the communities, should also have easy access to registration of their own projects because they are the ones who own these forests”.

Advertisement

The debate also focused on the establishment of a National Climate Fund.

Susan Matsunga insisted on rigorous oversight, suggesting a biennial reporting cycle to Parliament to ensure progress is measurable. “This is about building a culture of transparency that ensures our climate goals are not just promises on paper but measurable achievements,” Matsunga stated.

Murombedzi added that “Climate finance must not vanish into corridors in Harare; it must flow to the ward level where resilience is built”.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Binga

Lawmaker urges localized climate strategies for Tsholotsho, Hwange

Published

on

BY NOKUTHABA DLAMINI

A Shamva South lawmaker has called for a radical shift in climate change mitigation strategies, demanding that the government abandon “one-size-fits-all” projects in favor of solutions that respect the unique geography and culture of districts like Tsholotsho, Hwange, and Binga.

Advertisement

During the debate on the Climate Change Management Bill, Joseph Mapiki argued that national programs often fail because they ignore local realities.

“We should look at our projects in terms of the area,” Mapiki told the National Assembly. “For example, in Tsholotsho and Hwange, where there are game parks, we cannot force them to do horticulture because there is no water. We should encourage them to engage in tourism”.

Mapiki also challenged the government’s staffing policies for climate initiatives, insisting that local language and cultural knowledge are essential for the success of any environmental committee.

Advertisement

“If someone from Mashonaland Central goes and is incorporated in a Committee in Binga, it means that the Committee will not function well because that person will not be conversant with the language,” he argued.

He further emphasized that “First preference should be given to the locals to avoid taking people from other areas… because those other people will not be aware of the language and culture of the people there”.

Beyond staffing and local projects, Mapiki raised concerns about the influence of international donors on Zimbabwe’s environmental policy.

Advertisement

He urged the government to ensure that the majority of climate funding is domestic to avoid “stringent measures and conditions” imposed by foreign entities.

“Our plea Hon. Minister, is that 98% funding for that Bill should be from Zimbabwe,” Mapiki stated.

“Foreign funding is hampering our progress”. His remarks were supported by other MPs who noted that climate change mainstreaming must include the “vulnerable communities” and “local authorities” who are on the frontlines of weather shocks in the province.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 VicFallsLive. All rights reserved, powered by Advantage